The BAC is the most accurate you can get for anticheat detection since it’s client side. The anticheat is good but not fast, this will add the speed. And about mac, you don’t need to use BLC. It would be optional. They just won’t be protected by the anticheat without BLC.
The only reason why the anticheat is not fast is because it works in ban waves
Yes, BAC would be more accurate and precise, and ban before you lose your skywars game to a hacker.
But less precise and accurate. Also, the anticheat takes over a minute to detect a blatant hacker. It then puts it in the banwave. BAC takes 5 seconds.
Sentinel wouldn’t be removed, and sentinel would still have a job even with BAC. BAC is designed for those with Badlion Client, banning hackers who fight them in a matter of seconds. Those without BLC still need an anticheat, so that’s where Sentinel comes in. Anyone using badlion client (so a lot of ranked players who need the wins for leaderboards) would never be dealing with hackers, but normal players would need Sentinel.
And that without even mentioning that probably not everyone is able to download it. My old laptop already had problems with running minecraft in general, adding more downloads to it would make it impossible to play or record
He resigned and was rude against me, no thank you
That is anything but true, players have always complained about sentinel sadly enough ):
It is for everyone if anyone can download it, and it makes Minecraft faster and isn't cpu heavy.
Well Minecraft is heavier than bandicam, so yes. Is BLC heavier than Minecraft, not by much.
Fair enough. Just, this anticheat will ban the hackers if they fight against the person using BLC, meaning people in vanilla Minecraft still won’t have to deal with them since they will be banned
