It indeed is not relevant to what we're talking about, but informing others of the rules is something good. As I've said twice already, it won't help your case at all and on top of that it will result in punishment.
Pretending and hoping/believing are not the same thing. When the games I played often were removed, I was devastated. In the beginning, I was really sceptical as well about whether it would work, but realized eventually that if the server went on as it was, it was going to be the downfall of the Java network anyway. Ultimately, I too want the best for CubeCraft and if the leads think that this is the way to save the network, why not try
Well, that's where you're wrong. See, it has been specifically mentioned that this update will in fact mainly focus on the Java network (obviously they'll port over the maps to Bedrock as well, but the focus for the update lies mainly on Java). What you're saying is simply untrue.
As you can see in the first picture, they're planning on adding a new hub & a new hunt; They'll publish a new bundle, probably for Bedrock, yes; The network-wide resource pack; Full 1.19 support along with updated maps; They'll update existing games
'and much more'.
You shouldn't judge before you see the content in-game and experience it firsthand. The resource pack they're going to publish won't be like your average 'YouTuber-made' resource pack nor is it one that revamps your entire game. Clearly, the purpose of the resource pack they're working on is to improve server content by providing a slick chat layout (Prefixes) and, as shown in the second picture, unite Bedrock and Java's lobby ambience using custom 3D models for (I assume not only) the NPCs. Obviously we don't know what else they will or might change in that resource pack, but I believe you will be amazed by the work they put into all of it, the update in general too.
Are you seriously comparing CubeCraft, a server that has been online for around ten years and has fared/fares really well (Currently on Bedrock, in the past on Java too) to a server that was recently founded and flopped? Not only that but you're comparing two very different situations: 1) A server that was created recently and hasn't undergone any drastic changes, and 2) a server which was created a long time ago and has been a host to several drastic changes in the past that is about to go through another one. In both cases, it's not the same thing... At all.