Ignore threads

[A pigeon]

Can we get the ability to ignire threads that we arent interested in? They shouldnt even appear in suggestions but similar ti ignored messages there would be an option to toggle on/off.

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

Can we get the ability to ignire threads that we arent interested in? They shouldnt even appear in suggestions but similar ti ignored messages there would be an option to toggle on/off.

I get what you’re saying... but I’m 50/50 on this one. It doesnt seem that relevant but yet there are a few different language suggestions and even topics you aren’t into. But at the same time everyone should get a chance to speak
My opinion is 50/50
+.5

 

[MagnificentSpam]

Quality suggestion +1
https://www.cubecraft.net/threads/ignore-threads.195076/

 

[_Oplex_]

yeah +1. i hate the media section in my threads

 

[MarcoPlayzz]

I don't know if I agree or disagree, if you don't want to see a thread on your posts or a thread that you already replied and don't want to see it again, then just ignore it.
Don't need to have a section where all of your ignored threads are. I'm 50/50

 

[A pigeon]

So that I can ignore all threads except ones regarding my parody song

 

[OnePointEight.exe]

My opinion is 50/50
+.5

Fake News, if you were 50/50 the fraction would equate to 1 a positive 1, thus +1. However if you were equally negative as you were positive, as you intended, it would be represented as -x+x which would simply be 0 thus +0 not +0.5.

 

[Zethox]

Hmmm I agree

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

Fake News, if you were 50/50 the fraction would equate to 1 a positive 1, thus +1. However if you were equally negative as you were positive, as you intended, it would be represented as -x+x which would simply be 0 thus +0 not +0.5.

Seriously, stop making yourself look weird
Im sayin I am 50% on each side so I put +.5 which is the same things as 0.5 so...
No need to be a jerk about it though
:/

 

[A pigeon]

Seriously, stop making yourself look weird
Im sayin I am 50% on each side so I put +.5 which is the same things as 0.5 so...
No need to be a jerk about it though
:/

Uhm non knowing basic math makes you look weird tbh. This doesnt make blom look weird in any way

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

Uhm non knowing basic math makes you look weird tbh. This doesnt make blom look weird in any way

I know I am just saying that I stated an opinion that I was 50/50 about the topic and he went all super serious about it all which is annoying when people one the forums do that.
And I know much more than basic math
it all started with me just stating my opinion...

 

[OnePointEight.exe]

It was mainly a joke, but being +0.5 would mean you are
A). 50% With and 50% NEUTRAL.
B). 75% with and 25% against.
However if you pulled the max derivitive of the equidistant latera across the positive quadratic function with a coefficient of approximately three to the power of nine logarithm, you soon understand the catastrophic even that it does not apply to the theory if thermodynamics, especially in the 4th law. However if you were to exhibit the relationship between the two numbers you can clearly tell there is only one number you are analyzing thus creating a paradoxical equation to the fourth and a half degree. This will then have a 48.978% chance of combusting into a new state of matter resulting in the start of world war three, then four, five, six, seven, eight, ten. Skipping nine since that is what all the hip technological companies are doing. However the other 51.123% of the time it will cause an impartial hypotenuse which may start a chain reaction which could make triangles stand up for themselves and let them create time machines to destroy the world, they went back a few years so now look at the illuminati.

So why am I being so technical you ask? Because you could if just started 7 World Wars or started the illuminati.

 

[_Oplex_]

It was mainly a joke, but being +0.5 would mean you are
A). 50% With and 50% NEUTRAL.
B). 75% with and 25% against.
However if you pulled the max derivitive of the equidistant latera across the positive quadratic function with a coefficient of approximately three to the power of nine logarithm, you soon understand the catastrophic even that it does not apply to the theory if thermodynamics, especially in the 4th law. However if you were to exhibit the relationship between the two numbers you can clearly tell there is only one number you are analyzing thus creating a paradoxical equation to the fourth and a half degree. This will then have a 48.978% chance of combusting into a new state of matter resulting in the start of world war three, then four, five, six, seven, eight, ten. Skipping nine since that is what all the hip technological companies are doing. However the other 51.123% of the time it will cause an impartial hypotenuse which may start a chain reaction which could make triangles stand up for themselves and let them create time machines to destroy the world, they went back a few years so now look at the illuminati.

So why am I being so technical you ask? Because you could if just started 7 World Wars or started the illuminati.

That my sir, is:

Spoiler

DANK AF

 

[Livvv]

I dont understand why and how this can bother you so much tbh.