Escalated just a suggestion about sentinel reports

[remio]

Elevated this.

Amazing!

 

[Lezappen]

Amazing!

Be sure to check the edit, I specified a few more details as to why I think it should be escalated.
https://www.cubecraft.net/threads/just-a-suggestion-about-sentinel-reports.205806/#post-974775

 

[Deleted member 352903]

Escalated this :
Denied = the reported offence doesn't match the provided evidence/invalid report
Closed = the reported offence that would have been accepted but Sentinel or another moderator dealt with the user in the time before the report has been handled.
Closed reports can be used/viewed as they contain usefull extra evidence.

H E Y
@ZoonTijd thief of escalated tags >;(

 

[Injunction]

Escalated this :
Denied = the reported offence doesn't match the provided evidence/invalid report
Closed = the reported offence that would have been accepted but Sentinel or another moderator dealt with the user in the time before the report has been handled.
Closed reports can be used/viewed as they contain usefull extra evidence.

What is an admin deals with them

Okay i’ll Shut up


My point to the actual suggestion is how would this be necessarily useful
I mean if they are hacking they’d be banned shortly later even after having appeal accepted
But if they were actually hacking and their appeal probably wouldn’t be accepted as Sentinel is getting more and modern accurate

 

[Lucaatjee]

Yeah! More colors.


I agree :)

 

[Priley]

Yeah! More colors.


I agree :)

I'm gonna be honest, this is btw not only meant towards you


But like ALL of these replies are about a new tag "Denied"
And it triggers me

@Lezappen did you escalate my idea or Spununi's idea actually? Because you also kinda got off topic :cool:

 

[Deleted member 352903]

@Lezappen did you escalate my idea or Spununi's idea actually? Because you also kinda got off topic :cool:

Mine.
Berre you thief! :0

 

[Lezappen]

Did you escalate my idea or Spununi's idea actually? Because you also kinda got off topic :cool:

I escalated a combination of both your ideas.

 

[Priley]

I escalated a combination of both your ideas.

yay @Kqjwjevebeowjqhn we're famous

 

[Shallidor]

Nice poll you wannabe idiot ;)

Jk nice suggestion 100% agreed

 

[CyberAutumn]

Funny, it didn't show me tagged.

Anyways, I fully agree. +1

 

[Shrek Trained Me]

I like it but not gonna like it cuz i didn't get my tag.

 

[Deleted member 352903]

Funny, it didn't show me tagged.

Anyways, I fully agree. +1

Because he tagged you editing the post https://www.cubecraft.net/threads/another-suggestion.205438/

 

[Priley]

bump
Next to that, I saw players getting punished using labymod evidence, then I contacted the mod asking explanation and they said "There was more evidence submitted by players not using labymod"
SO DONT USE THE LABYMOD EVIDENCE AS PROOF LMAO

 

[TwinShards]

This thread sound like my thread, but the request is a bit different, but still go the same way. :P

 

[Injunction]

I actually report quite a lot of hackers
But most of the time Sentinel bans them after I reported them, and my report gets closed
Idc if it gets closed, but I feel like the evidence (video) I provided should be on their appeal, this way Crazyman can handle appeals of players that are wrongly banned way faster

win-win, right?

Players (hackers) only get an unban if they were not hacking, so if I were to have clear evidence, appealing is not necessairy anymore

yay

edit: woops I forgot tags
@Kqjwjevebeowjqhn @lil' sheep @CyberAutumn @Gainfullterror @MegaCoin
well you always give good feedback
go wild

another edit:
some idiots wanted tag too :>
@PapaTijd @CyberAutumn

lol another edit:
Next to all this, I saw players getting punished using labymod evidence, then I contacted the mod asking explanation and they said "There was more evidence submitted by players not using labymod"
SO DONT USE THE LABYMOD EVIDENCE AS PROOF LMAO

Yes I agree

However just so you know
If you edit a tag into your message it doesn’t actual notify them
You have to tag them in your original post

Edit: @ZoonTijd see proof