[Skywars] Kits

[Gainfullterror]

I never said you wouldn't survive, I'm only saying that kits could be more fun if they're useful in every SkyWars mode, which is why this thread was created.

What you said is subjective, and what I'm about to say is also purely subjective: I honestly think it's more fun to be encouraged to use different kits depending on the mode. It offers more diverse gameplay, and won't give you that same template you have every other game.

I've honestly never been in an OP game without a sword that's better than the swordsman kit sword. So that's why it's 100% useless, which means that that insurance is unnecesarry if you get a better sword like all time.

Chances, my friend. If you experience something 100% of the time, that doesn't make it a fact that it happens 100% of the time.
Again: You don't have to use the kit if it's not built for the mode. Use something that does work well in OP.

 

[Deleted member 100818]

What you said is subjective, and what I'm about to say is also purely subjective: I honestly think it's more fun to be encouraged to use different kits depending on the mode. It offers more diverse gameplay, and won't give you that same template you have every other game.
.

Fair enough

Chances, my friend. If you experience something 100% of the time, that doesn't make it a fact that it happens 100% of the time.

Well my point was that I've experienced it so much that I'm convinced it's really 100% (If it's not I do understand your point but at this point, I'm sstill conviced =3)

W
Again: You don't have to use the kit if it's not built for the mode. Use something that does work well in OP.

If it's 5 against 5 for example that's pretty useless. I don't know about you, but I get a bit frustrated when the votes are equaled and I'm the one with the wrong kit. Which might be a reason this thread is created. And I think they should be made for any mode, they never said they were so why should they? The kits indeed built for a specific vote result, but Scott is suggesting to chance that (and I agree with it).

 

[Gainfullterror]

If it's 5 against 5 for example that's pretty useless. I don't know about you, but I get a bit frustrated when the votes are equaled and I'm the one with the wrong kit. Which might be a reason this thread is created. And I think they should be made for any mode, they never said they were so why should they? The kits indeed built for a specific vote result, but Scott is suggesting to chance that (and I agree with it).

If it's 50/50 with voting, then you have just as much chance as the others to choose the less favoured kit. If one mode is obviously going to win, then you know which kit to pick.
Everybody's on equal terms.
This is no reason to tear down the usefulness of kits compared to one another depending on the voted mode.

 

[Deleted member 100818]

If it's 50/50 with voting, then you have just as much chance as the others to choose the less favoured kit. If one mode is obviously going to win, then you know which kit to pick.
Everybody's on equal terms.

I never said they weren't equal, this is just a suggestion to make the kits more equal to the vote results. Why having a few kits which you can use for OP if you can just use them all?

This is no reason to tear down the usefulness of kits compared to one another depending on the voted mode.

In my opinion it is. Kit swordsman is less useful than kit iron golem when it's OP. While you can just have all kits equaled by changing it per vote. I still think that's better. And I don't know how long this 1vs1 conversation is gonna take xD (Not that I'm not enjoying it, I love these conversation really)

 

[Gainfullterror]

Why having a few kits which you can use for OP if you can just use them all?

Because everyone is just going to pick swordsman or tank when it's OP. The fact that those two kits aren't too great for OP right now, means players are going to be more likely to actually use other kits. Whats the fun in having a game where only one or two kits are chosen? Wouldn't that be a sign that they're too good compared to the others?
Different vote modes -> Different useful kits -> Different playing experience -> Less repetitive gameplay -> More fun in the long run

Also, after saying it x times, you can still pick said kit. It still exists. If it's useful to you or not, depends on the chests which you can see after you start the game and receive a kit.

 

[Deleted member 100818]

Because everyone is just going to pick swordsman or tank when it's OP. The fact that those two kits aren't too great for OP right now, means players are going to be more likely to actually use other kits. Whats the fun in having a game where only one or two kits are chosen? Wouldn't that be a sign that they're too good compared to the others?
Different vote modes -> Different useful kits -> Different playing experience -> Less repetitive gameplay -> More fun in the long run

Well if you just look at the kits, some of them are barely used already. And kits like bomber, joker and redstone master will still be used. It's just a fact that those 2 are the 2 main kits which you can't really change (they tried tho by changing the content tho). Have you even seen a player using kit spiderman for example? Well I definitely not.

 

[Gainfullterror]

Well if you just look at the kits, some of them are barely used already. And kits like bomber, joker and redstone master will still be used. It's just a fact that those 2 are the 2 main kits which you can't really change (they tried tho by changing the content tho). Have you even seen a player using kit spiderman for example? Well I definitely not.

At this point I don't think we can convince each other of our POV on this suggestion. I probably won't be replying to you if you reply to this one, as I believe I already said everything I needed to.
But to answer your question: I do see the occasional spiderman kit, since some players like to stick others in webs to effectively give them a free kill.

 

[Deleted member 100818]

At this point I don't think we can convince each other of our POV on this suggestion. I probably won't be replying to you if you reply to this one, as I believe I already said everything I needed to.

The same goes for me.

EDIT: I did enjoy discussing this with you so at least thanks for that ^.^