Solid evidence of hacks and they can still get a repeal??? Why?

[de_avesta]

So over the past month or so there have been many hackers i have come across. I report when i can and have gotten many banned but on one of my videos one hacker has had conversation with me. Just look at the comets, he says he made a fake appeal and got away with it. If you think that the evidence was not great enough just watch the video for yourself. If I can get some more of an explanation that would be great thanks.

 

[Jeff_Bllkth]

So over the past month or so there have been many hackers i have come across. I report when i can and have gotten many banned but on one of my videos one hacker has had conversation with me. Just look at the comets, he says he made a fake appeal and got away with it. If you think that the evidence was not great enough just watch the video for yourself. If I can get some more of an explanation that would be great thanks.

This is how the ban system works:
-First ban: 1 month.
-Second ban: Permanent.

They just need a ban more to get banned permanently. If you see them again, record and report them!!

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

So over the past month or so there have been many hackers i have come across. I report when i can and have gotten many banned but on one of my videos one hacker has had conversation with me. Just look at the comets, he says he made a fake appeal and got away with it. If you think that the evidence was not great enough just watch the video for yourself. If I can get some more of an explanation that would be great thanks.

Luckily for you jokes on them if they "fake an appeal" and after they are caught again the first ban is reinstated on their record and they are given their permanent ban

 

[de_avesta]

its been less than a month and he/she says that they have been repealed i just got a little annoyed that i gave this much proof and still they get unbanned via repeal. atleast make them wait out their punishment.

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

its been less than a month and he/she says that they have been repealed i just got a little annoyed that i gave this much proof and still they get unbanned via repeal. atleast make them wait out their punishment.

Again if he abused this unban next time hes caught its a permanent ban

 

[xXNiChO_29Xx]

Life is Unfair... Let's just live with it.
I'm really sorry to hear that.
But I am sure that this War against Hackers will be won by us.

 

[xXNiChO_29Xx]

This is how the ban system works:
-First ban: 1 month.
-Second ban: Permanent.

They just need a ban more to get banned permanently. If you see them again, record and report them!!

Also... Think that's fair? "If you see them again"?

 

[Jeff_Bllkth]

Also... Think that's fair? "If you see them again"?

What about that? If he see those hackers again, he should record them

 

[TradeOffer]

Wouldn't it make sense that, if the ban is in-fact a valid ban, then they aren't allowed to be unbanned?

So, they can appeal, if the offender thinks it's invalid, but within the appeal, the staff opinion is that it was valid, then they just have to wait out the month ban.

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

Wouldn't it make sense that, if the ban is in-fact a valid ban, then they aren't allowed to be unbanned?

So, they can appeal, if the offender thinks it's invalid, but within the appeal, the staff opinion is that it was valid, then they just have to wait out the month ban.

You basically described how our appeal system works, if they appeal and its denied and they cant change the staff members mind they have to wait it out

 

[Ellie Williams]

This is how the ban system works:
-First ban: 1 month.
-Second ban: Permanent.

They just need a ban more to get banned permanently. If you see them again, record and report them!!

Luckily for you jokes on them if they "fake an appeal" and after they are caught again the first ban is reinstated on their record and they are given their permanent ban

Again if he abused this unban next time hes caught its a permanent ban

I don't think that's the point of his thread.

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

I don't think that's the point of his thread.

Well his wording is not clear enough to understand what the problem is

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

Well his wording is not clear enough to understand what the problem is

He thinks its bs that this "fake appeal" got his ban lifted. His suggestion? Hackers should remain banned under solid evidence.

 

[Deleted member 269142]

Can you still appeal after a second ban?

 

[Rakion]

Sometimes staff members make mistakes, they're humans. If he got away with the fake appeal, then just ignore it and if you see him again ban him. Someone should be remained banned for saying he got a fake appeal, because it was just chat related offense, and he could be easily trolling. Catch him hacking, and then you got something. Hopefully this helped. If I did something wrong/did something wrong correct me, due to the fact I didn't really understand the thread.

 

[Rakion]

Can you still appeal after a second ban?

I don't think so, a second time is a perm ban, meaning it is permanent, and he can not appeal. He can appeal on the first ban which is 1 month, and shorten his time. But not for a second time since it's a permanent ban, and permanent means forever with no exceptions.

 

[Jeff_Bllkth]

I don't think that's the point of his thread.

What's the point then according to you? I wrote what I thought he needed to know

 

[Snodia]

Can you still appeal after a second ban?

You can. Though if your previous appeal was denied, there's very little chance that the appeal will be accepted. Or if the previous appeal was accepted, there's not much of a chance of getting accepted again. Because if you were caught a 2nd time, it essentially means that you lied in your previous appeal, just to get back on the server.

 

[zRinne]

its been less than a month and he/she says that they have been repealed i just got a little annoyed that i gave this much proof and still they get unbanned via repeal. atleast make them wait out their punishment.

Look at it this way, they get caught and punished, their appeal got accepted and caught again.
This means the chances of getting their appeal accepted is below 1%, you may never see him again.
More efficient to accept/deny the moment we get the appeal. If they think we're lenient then that's their downfall because we can be harsh to those who are willing to test and bend the rules.

As the saying goes :
Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice, shame on me.

Trust our judgement(s) we've dealt with countless rule breakers/liars

 

[Ellie Williams]

Look at it this way, they get caught and punished, their appeal got accepted and caught again.
This means the chances of getting their appeal accepted is below 1%, you may never see him again.
More efficient to accept/deny the moment we get the appeal. If they think we're lenient then that's their downfall because we can be harsh to those who are willing to test and bend the rules.

As the saying goes :
Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice, shame on me.

Trust our judgement(s) we've dealt with countless rule breakers/liars

So it's like a test to see if they're truthful in their appeal?