Sugestions to rules of videos, to report a player

[alejandro daniel]

I think the people who consider the videos its valid or not to consider somebody is hac (admins and moderators) have to take into account next things

-The evidence video have to last 15 seconds at least (to be enought proof)
-You maybe have to push one time at least in the video key "tab" to see the players are playing
-The camera that its taking video of hack ... have to move, dont have to be static in the recording (to avoid edit videos)
-Dont use texture packs because could be confusing some times

If you consider this things maybe the videos be most clear to the reporter and the hacker thas its being reported.

 

[Max ♠]

Oh yes boy! I would totally ever record a hacker if I have to turn of my texture pack and have to do all these things! (Sarcasm) -1

 

[Megaaa]

-The evidence video have to last 15 seconds at least (to be enought proof)

Sometimes you have clear evidence from 5 seconds.

-You maybe have to push one time at least in the video key "tab" to see the players are playing

If you are standing close to him, you also can see his name;

-Dont use texture packs because could be confusing some times

How can this be confusing?

 

[telegamer]

It's good as it is now. Don't see how any of this would change anything, for example my texturepack, if I knock off a hacker, I cant turn my texturepack off. Doesn't make any sence. As said, 5 seconds can be enough too.

 

[Britney Spears]

-The evidence video have to last 15 seconds at least (to be enought proof)
-You maybe have to push one time at least in the video key "tab" to see the players are playing
-The camera that its taking video of hack ... have to move, dont have to be static in the recording (to avoid edit videos)
-Dont use texture packs because could be confusing some times
.

1.) Evidence doesn't need to be 15 seconds or higher , you can see that someone is using for example anti-knockback by just shooting two arrows at him. And our staff team is very critical about evidence , they won't ban someone when there isn't enough evidence.

2.) Isn't necessary because he wouldn't be in the game right if he wasn't playing. And yes , people can add nicknames with labymod but we don't accept reports, where people used labymod. Due to that people can change names.

3.) Videos are never static that's why we don't accept pictures of someone flying for example. And again. When there isn't enough evidence the player in dispute won't be banned

4.)Texture packs are used by almost everyone so if we did this and they would actually encounter a hacker they would probably be dead by the time they un-installed their texture pack.

 

[hgbf]

I think the people who consider the videos its valid or not to consider somebody is hac (admins and moderators) have to take into account next things

-The evidence video have to last 15 seconds at least (to be enought proof)
-You maybe have to push one time at least in the video key "tab" to see the players are playing
-The camera that its taking video of hack ... have to move, dont have to be static in the recording (to avoid edit videos)
-Dont use texture packs because could be confusing some times

If you consider this things maybe the videos be most clear to the reporter and the hacker thas its being reported.

1. No. You don't need that long evidence to see if the player is actually hacking.

2. It's not that easy to press tab when you see a hacker. If you only see him/her for a few seconds, it will be hard to press it in time. Sometimes it can block the nametag of the player that you report.

3. If you get enough evidence without moving, why would you move?

4. Having to disable your texturepack every time you see a hacker would make it WAY hardet to get evidence...

 

[Max ♠]

-You maybe have to push one time at least in the video key "tab" to see the players are playing

"Tab" is my hotkey to my 7th slot . Very usefull in a report

 

[NedGaming]

@Scottyyyy Ur best friend ;)





no

 

[WhyDoYouHack]

:)

 

[SrKlompenstein]

Does this not matter to me. If there can be clearly seen in the video that the person have hacks, is that enough.
-1 from me :)

 

[Troublesomee]

@Scottyyyy Ur best friend ;)





no

:P No.. xD

Why , Your making this thread because you got fairly banned 3 times :/

 

[NedGaming]

:p No.. xD

Why , Your making this thread because you got fairly banned 3 times :/

 

[Marieke2001]

Nahh, there are no changes needed ;3.