^
basic moderation behavior, but seems to be difficult for some.
basic moderation behavior, but seems to be difficult for some.
-Locked
Okay jokes aside in most cases yes
Stop copying me I said that first.-Locked.
+1
I agree.
~locked
That thread was ridiculous, nobody has ever used a Churchill skin to offend people, in fact, nobody has ever used a Churchill skin. All that thread was good for was to discuss the politics, where most people probably still disagree with you, I absolutely do. "This is not the place for political discussions" was a valid reason to lock that thread.OK Admittedly, I was planning to make a meme by getting a thread have the IMPLEMENTED tag, then changing its name to “Remove Eggwars”. the only way to accomplish this was to make a thread that was very likely to get added- a thread suggesting to ban soemthing offensive.
The best way for this to be accomplished, after some digging, was to get Winston Churchill name and skin banned, even though I have never seen one.
But then, our fave Quetzi comes along and locks the thread. It had nothing to do with politcs, more about racism (once again all i wanted to do was to make a meme by changing the title once it got escalated)
tldr that thread was locked without justifiable reason. If someone suggested “Hitler skins should be allowed” imagine what wouod happen.
u should have done it with Lenin or Mao instead since anyone British cant ever possibly do something wrong rightOK Admittedly, I was planning to make a meme by getting a thread have the IMPLEMENTED tag, then changing its name to “Remove Eggwars”. the only way to accomplish this was to make a thread that was very likely to get added- a thread suggesting to ban soemthing offensive.
The best way for this to be accomplished, after some digging, was to get Winston Churchill name and skin banned, even though I have never seen one.
But then, our fave Quetzi comes along and locks the thread. It had nothing to do with politcs, more about racism (once again all i wanted to do was to make a meme by changing the title once it got escalated)
tldr that thread was locked without justifiable reason. If someone suggested “Hitler skins should be allowed” imagine what wouod happen.
Would have but Mao is already bannableu should have done it with Lenin or Mao instead since anyone British cant ever possibly do something wrong right
No I just wanted an implemented tag for a meme. Was going to change title to remove Eggwars for Copying You cant discuss politics about dead peopleThat thread was ridiculous, nobody has ever used a Churchill skin to offend people, in fact, nobody has ever used a Churchill skin. All that thread was good for was to discuss the politics, where most people probably still disagree with you, I absolutely do. "This is not the place for political discussions" was a valid reason to lock that thread.
Classic Q, he really likes his lock button but seems to find the worst moments to use itBut then, our fave Quetzi comes along and locks the thread. It had nothing to do with politcs, more about racism (once again all i wanted to do was to make a meme by changing the title once it got escalated)
Not to be rude, but I wish he'd relax a little bit with the thread handling. He does really like his lock button, and I get the impression he doesn't read more than the title. He recently moved a very valid suggestion on the grounds that it wasn't a suggestion... :/ And don't even get me started on the meme dump post >.<Classic Q, he really likes his lock button but seems to find the worst moments to use it
Yay, a USSR-related question, my favourite!what did lenin do wrong im uncultured when it cmes to russian stuff
Who did you quote there? The op was asking for more feedback when locking a thread and then some people are asking to lock less threads. It's possible to reply to a topic without locking it, so I don't understand your quote."We don't get enough feedback from management"
"We don't like the feedback from management, I wish they wouldn't"
We want good feedback, not the kind that locks threads based on the nature of the title alone, or moves threads without good reason."We don't like the feedback from management, I wish they wouldn't"
Can't have it both ways, Staff Feedback is there for a reason.
Talk about a strawman fallacy."We don't like the feedback from management, I wish they wouldn't"