/Votekick on eggwars

[BUTTERFIELD8]

So last night and today I have been playing tower defense, but my fav game it egg wars. Today I was playing tower defense and someone was a bit of a control freak and wanting to kick this one player for placing 2 mage towers in a row and I was like we need this in eggwars cuz this would help remove hackers (after we record them) and the spectators who are like "OMG YOU ARE A HACKER" or "I'm not going to leave and I will just bug you". Hmm you say it will get abused well if it dose give it to registered reporting users and if it still gets abused give it to donors.

 

[Cynamooo]

Nah, okay, you'll kick the rule-breaker for his faults, but the only persons who get advantage are you. If you kick him and then report him, it is the same as just reporting the person but leave him in-game. I know a lot of people would love this so they don't face any hackers anymore, but they will hack 100% of the time again in the next game. So the time the rule-breaker gets his ban is the same amount of time with both of the systems. Another thing is that you need probably more than 50% of the map to get him kicked, but what if that guy has kill aura or anti-knockback? Only you see it, so only your vote will count, and if people are smart enough they are not going to vote for someone who doesn't have hacks but they just heard it from somebody else who could be lying. Eggwars should be called "Goodluck, the last person who doesn't get kicked wins" then.

 

[Krealίxx]

First off, this will get abused badly.

Oh, you suggest to have a vote kick for registered reporting users? It probably wouldn't be used at all by then. And just because they made a report doesn't mean they can't be abused. As for donors, I rarely see more than 2 donors in a game, and if 2 donors have a power to kick some player, it can be abused.

To add on to that, it's just a kick, those who are registered reporting users can just record them instead, they would hack the next game and it wouldn't be useful.

 

[BUTTERFIELD8]

Nah, okay, you'll kick the rule-breaker for his faults, but the only persons who get advantage are you. If you kick him and then report him, it is the same as just reporting the person but leave him in-game. I know a lot of people would love this so they don't face any hackers anymore, but they will hack 100% of the time again in the next game. So the time the rule-breaker gets his ban is the same amount of time with both of the systems. Another thing is that you need probably more than 50% of the map to get him kicked, but what if that guy has kill aura or anti-knockback? Only you see it, so only your vote will count, and if people are smart enough they are not going to vote for someone who doesn't have hacks but they just heard it from somebody else who could be lying. Eggwars should be called "Goodluck, the last person who doesn't get kicked wins" then.

True But I said report proof b4 kick, and you do have a point that is why there is a vote part to this =)

 

[BUTTERFIELD8]

First off, this will get abused badly.

Oh, you suggest to have a vote kick for registered reporting users? It probably wouldn't be used at all by then. And just because they made a report doesn't mean they can't be abused. As for donors, I rarely see more than 2 donors in a game, and if 2 donors have a power to kick some player, it can be abused.

To add on to that, it's just a kick, those who are registered reporting users can just record them instead, they would hack the next game and it wouldn't be useful.

No no no you would have to be a reporting user to use if it gets abused

 

[Krealίxx]

No no no you would have to be a reporting user to use if it gets abused

Like a user who has a reporting account? That's what I mean

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

I would rather have an afk kicker.

 

[MooTa]

This was suggested multiple time but I still disagree. The major reason why I disagree is because there might be 1 pro that every one think he is hacking, so many people will get false kick. Also Cubecraft is make a anti-cheat so the hacker issue will be solved soon.

 

[Unipotato]

People would abuse this too much, donors or not. Some people could convince others that someone was hacking that really wasn't, and an innocent player could be kicked, which obviously wouldn't be fair.

 

[WolfShine]

So last night and today I have been playing tower defense, but my fav game it egg wars. Today I was playing tower defense and someone was a bit of a control freak and wanting to kick this one player for placing 2 mage towers in a row and I was like we need this in eggwars cuz this would help remove hackers (after we record them) and the spectators who are like "OMG YOU ARE A HACKER" or "I'm not going to leave and I will just bug you". Hmm you say it will get abused well if it dose give it to registered reporting users and if it still gets abused give it to donors.

Never, this would not be a very good thing to add in. You realize that a lot of players hackusate others, and would abuse this? Also if someone does not like someone else they would just try to kick them.

 

[TheLucian]

The really sad thing is this would be a great feature to add but it would just get abused. It is one more thing to report people on. This has been suggested many times though. Thank you so much for trying though. Have a great day!
~LY

 

[Power Ranger]

Vote kick is only on tower defence as that's a game that requires teamwork to win and a lot of people can bring down the team by not knowing what they are doing. Eggwars you can get around fine without any teammates and if one is doing poorly it has little effect on you compared to tower defence

 

[HeknonOfficial]

It could be abused in a cross team way if you know what i mean...

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

New way to get hackers

 

[RubberDucky23_]

I don't like it.. The people would abuse this command and is uncontrollable... [No]
If it's true that is one way to kick hackers and get a good ambiance, but one team can kick other and, isn't good idea... Sorry, but thanks

 

[CommunistCactus]

KronosReeper hacker! everyone /votekick KronosReeper!!!!11!one!1!!!!1!!
Total disaster.

 

[RubberDucky23_]

KronosReeper hacker! everyone /votekick KronosReeper!!!!11!one!1!!!!1!!
Total disaster.

Yes

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

I don't like it.. The people would abuse this command and is uncontrollable... [No]
If it's true that is one way to kick hackers and get a good ambiance, but one team can kick other and, isn't good idea... Sorry, but thanks

Good Point

 

[Marieke2001]

People will abuse this, just as example: You're in a team of 5 people and you noticed that 4 of them are skyping with eachother, which makes you alone. They think you're annoying because you don't listen and without you knowing it, they decide to /votekick you 4 times. Not really fair though because you did nothing wrong.

 

[RubberDucky23_]

Good Point

Thx :3