You keep saying it's against the EULA. It's clearly not.If it was up to me yeah. And looking at this thread most people agree.
You keep saying it's against the EULA. It's clearly not.If it was up to me yeah. And looking at this thread most people agree.
No , we dont want them to. All votes should be fairThis doesn't make any sense. Stone get 0 votes, Gold gets 1, obsidian can't get 2??????
Were you not talking about whether I think obsidians shouldn't get two votes a minute ago?You keep saying it's against the EULA. It's clearly not.
He is an emerald , but for some reason wants stuff for obsidian?Were you not talking about whether I think obsidians shouldn't get two votes a minute ago?
Does it matter my reasoning to you SO much?
All you should care about is that I DON'T want this. Are you like Obsidian and really want this or something.
But it isn't giving anything extra to people who pay more. No matter how they do the voting, as long as the vote effects everyone (which it does, it isn't like only ranks have access to OP items while everyone else only has access to normal items) it isn't against the EULA.Ummm...
You are essentially giving people who paid a bit of money EXTRA STUFF in game. That is literally the definition of the commercial EULA lmao.
That was a question.He is an emerald , but for some reason wants stuff for obsidian?
First part was a statement . The second was me expressing my inability to understand why he wants something that doeant concern him .That was a question.
Some people actually think of others. Not everyone is self-centered. :PFirst part was a statement . The second was me expressing my inability to understand why he wants something that doeant concern him .
I don't agree, high ranks already have enough advantages, and even voting is a big one. So no changes needed here. -1Hello..
So. My suggestion is to make votings (item types, health, etc.) more powerful depending on the rank of the person voting. For example, a gold rank votes for double health, but an obsidian rank votes for normal health, therefore, the game will be normal health as an obsidian rank has more power to it.
A good combination could be
Lapiz-Gold: 1 vote point
Diamond-Emerald: 2 vote points
Obsidian: 3 vote points
[This can also be done for other games, depending on which rank gives out which perks.]
Idk if this has been suggested before.
I think that it COULD be a good idea.
Let's see your opinions!
These posts are getting even more ridicolous. Voting is the ONLY thing they have. And obsidian has nothing. Why not give it an extra votehigh ranks already have enough advantages
http://prntscr.com/fox68j if you only play skywars and nothing else, then, don't buy obsidian, but don't say it doesn't have enough advantages. And I still don't agree.These posts are getting even more ridicolous. Voting is the ONLY thing they have. And obsidian has nothing. Why not give it an extra vote
Also, buying a rank is like donating, when you donate you don't expect nothing in return, but of course, they still give you a rank, because noone would buy it.http://prntscr.com/fox68j if you only play skywars and nothing else, then, don't buy obsidian, but don't say it doesn't have enough advantages. And I still don't agree.