Wins --> Vote

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

wins to vote is something I thought of where you win games to vote. Now here is the thing. Rather than having to pay to vote. You would get 5000 wins to vote ONLY IN THAT GAME. Other games you would have to gain 5000 wins and in all games. If the staff team disagrees and so fo the players, I understand why. "Cubecraft needs the money to run the server so donations are always cool" I get that. So what do you think?

 

[Deleted member 169486]

wins to vote is something I thought of where you win games to vote. Now here is the thing. Rather than having to pay to vote. You would get 5000 wins to vote ONLY IN THAT GAME. Other games you would have to gain 5000 wins and in all games. If the staff team disagrees and so fo the players, I understand why. "Cubecraft needs the money to run the server so donations are always cool" I get that. So what do you think?

No. Voting is for people that donate.

 

[A pigeon]

wins to vote is something I thought of where you win games to vote. Now here is the thing. Rather than having to pay to vote. You would get 5000 wins to vote ONLY IN THAT GAME. Other games you would have to gain 5000 wins and in all games. If the staff team disagrees and so fo the players, I understand why. "Cubecraft needs the money to run the server so donations are always cool" I get that. So what do you think?

Yes pls

 

[Shamel]

No, if this gets added I'm gonna feel like I got scammed.

 

[Livvv]

It's good like it is atm

 

[MimicPanda]

The problem with this is how ranks would feel after one of the few privileges they have is given to people who did not pay for a rank.

 

[Gainfullterror]

"Ranks will feel scammed" aside, who even has 5000 wins on some gamemodes (on which you can vote) aside from the leaderboard peeps?
It's an extremely uncommon condition in order to be able to vote, and I'm pretty sure everyone above that amount of wins already has a rank.
I don't think this is a practical option to be honest, and voting isn't even that big of a deal.

 

[Gaaabb]

Voting is a thing for donators, and my opinion is that a 'rank' need to be pleasing for players that 'don't' have a rank. Sorry but, no

 

[Ducky]

I don't support this suggestion since this would take away a perk of the ranks. Donating is something you can do if you have a rank, so if you don't have a rank, you shouldn't be able to donate.

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

wins to vote is something I thought of where you win games to vote. Now here is the thing. Rather than having to pay to vote. You would get 5000 wins to vote ONLY IN THAT GAME. Other games you would have to gain 5000 wins and in all games. If the staff team disagrees and so fo the players, I understand why. "Cubecraft needs the money to run the server so donations are always cool" I get that. So what do you think?

#ScamMaster2017

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

#ScamMaster2017

What is scam master?

 

[Injunction]

gets 5000 wins to be able to vote
instead of buying ranks

Okay so everyone whom bought a rank no longer gets to vote and in almost every game it will be normal
Hmm...
definitely not

however if that wasn't what you were referring to and ranks keep their ability to vote
people with 5000 wins would have in almost all cases won majority of their games in 1 mode
for example @Jeff_Bllkth has the most wins on Blockwars, now most of these wins would be in with no modifier
now what do you think he will vote for than if he had a diamond rank?

continue the examples Jefe_Maestro1 has 15,000 wins on solo skywars, now obviously most of those would have been in normal, as a stone rank right now

what do you think they would vote for?
Probably normal as they have won the most games in normal

so for the people whom pass this number and don't have diamond or higher for a rank, they would likely vote the default as that is what they have played, and won on the most so they know they can play it and have fun and if they like other modes very few of them wouldn't have already bought a rank and there is a real minority of players whom fit those requirements
I don't really see why it is necessary for that exact reason

 

[XiiKa]

No.
This suggestion is just as bad as a fidget spinner

lel, agreed tho.
Wouldn't be fair against the rankers.. would take away their perks

 

[CyberAutumn]

No. Just no.

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

@Fluffys_gurl lock this thread please, no one likes the idea

 

[FluffyRoses]

Locked upon request from thread owner