This has already been added to another forum and it doesn't discourage giving a reply to people, so I don't know why it would be any different here.
You could have, but you didn't because you had arguments that you wanted to point out. Same would probably happen if you had the option to...
To show that you disagree with what the person is saying...?
You seem to be viewing this as a very negative thing. If someone dislikes your post then they aren't doing it in a "hateful" manner. They are just using it as a tool to say they disagree or dislike whatever you're saying. No toxicity...
What if you want to dislike a post? Sometimes, posts don't need an explanation as to why they were disliked, and if there is any abuse then you can just hand out punishments to people who abuse it.
Read this:
Sometimes you don't have to explain why you disagree with something, and if the dislike rating was added it could display a more overall idea on how many people agree/disagree with something someone said. It just makes everything more convenient.
You know what's even more simple...
You know there's another forum for another Minecraft server, and it has both a dislike and a disagree rating? They actually make the forums more alive and kind of convenient. And the ratings don't seem to cause as much trouble as you seem to think they would. It's not the end of the world if...
The title says it all, I think it would be a nice addition. It might spice up the forums a bit, make it less boring. It's also a simple way to say you disagree with someone.
The filter just needs to be removed from party chat and the staff should deny reports of stuff in party chat too. I don't really care about the filter in public chat.
I said to add a second mode that would require BLC. So do something like replace speed eggwars with competitive eggwars. That way MAC people don't get completely shut off from eggwars.
@MagnificentSpam @TheBrownster and everyone who says that this can be bypassed:
We can't tell you how it works exactly because we did not code it. The source code isn't going to be revealed. I don't know what you want us to tell you, just look at every BAC server currently they are all doing...
Thank you.
@TheDqrkSqvqge.exe
I was banned falsely and my appeal wasn't accepted. You can say I hacked and all but there have always been people who were false banned with denied appeals.
I just, idk anymore. Why is everyone looking into every single negative thing about this? Look at GommeHD and Badlion, they prove that this BAC thing works perfectly without any problems of any sort. So, how can you guys still have so much doubt as to be against this?
Why is it a rule that BLC...
ha, no.
I've been false banned; my appeal wasn't accepted. I mean it expired now, but that doesn't mean it wasn't false. You also can't use the argument "I am smart enough to know that Sentinel is smart" because that's invalid. There is no certainty of what bans are false and which aren't.
It could be required to play certain competitive modes. That way you can be certain that everyone playing that mode is legit. It is out of the question to make it mandatory to have in order to log on, but not out of the question to have it mandatory to play certain games.
He means that if the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.