Yeah but not everyone is good at the game I hope you realise that
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Muting for hackusating? I get alot of hackusaters but i never get annoyed. Hackusating isn't bullying and it's fine if someone thinks someone is hacking and warn other players..
edit: I don't know what happened, but the post I quoted is now gone.
Auto clickers are pointless in 1.9, and in 1.8, without an anticheat, from 3rd person perspective, no one can tell they are auto clicking unless you see 10 quadrillion particles flying off you, but a 14 cps auto clicker is almost undetectable without an anticheat.
Sounds aside, sometimes you can tell it's kill aura just by how regular the hits are. Nobody that I've fought before, hits in a completely regular manner.
Everybody is bound to miss a hit or two, resulting in the interval between hits being extremely irregular. With a regular kill aura, it's almost perfect (due to connection and stuff, it'll never be perfect). Of course, this isn't enough proof sometimes, but it is quite the red flag if you're fighting someone.
You cant just get offended by every small thing that's said, otherwise you can always turn off ur chat fully to not get offended at all.
Nice ideas, I completely agree with mocking but false hackusations should only be punishable if done excessively.
True, but let the wrong version but they don't know it noobs get warned for excessively hackusating players who kill them using the skillset that's effective in that version.
Muting for hackusating? I get alot of hackusaters but i never get annoyed. Hackusating isn't bullying and it's fine if someone thinks someone is hacking and warn other players..
I think they are very good ideas, I hope they can incorporate them to the server. At least it would be nice to warn them.
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Well, you see, sometimes a hacker hacks in a game, but he can report people that hackusate him, if he got away with it. It's not impossible to get away with just one round. There's no proof the player was hacking. Instead though, I guess you could block the word hacker, haxer and all that and say "Don't accuse anyone, record and report them at reports.cubecraft.net". Because, really, you don't need a warning to get a hacker banned. Also sometimes people can't really tell the difference between a person with high ping or a person with reach. I'm neutral with the mockery part and would count it as bullying if any case, but hackusating can't be a possible rule, really. You can also take any hackusate towards you as a compliment to say that you're really good, or a hint to get better connection. xP
Edit: you can always report them in case if they were spamming. c:
Edit: you can always report them in case if they were spamming. c:
That's why I suggested only doing it excessively without evidence should be a warning.
Gainfullterror
Forum Professional
Wouldn't it be spam at that point?
Gainfullterror
Forum Professional
I highly doubt that there are clients that exist that cannot toggle the HUD elements.
edit: I don't know what happened, but the post I quoted is now gone.
Last edited:
You could just hide them. I, myself, made my own server and tested hacks on my other account so I know the difference between lag and hacks, and what type of logs console gives me. All the clients I tried had a "Hide options" button which hides every option from plain sight.
Some people are way too insecure *cough* and dunno how to deal with the smallest things, imo they shouldnt even be on the internet :)
If someone says you're a hacker, but you're not. Just take it as a complement. Why would it need a mute?
And how can you proof you weren't actually hacking?
And how can you proof you weren't actually hacking?
Sorry I can't be bothered to waste my time deleting all but the message I want to quote you for, it went something like, with 1.9 PVP mechanics it is harder to detect hacks. How does that make any sense? What is so different about the versions that makes looking for cheats more difficult? Aimbot is identical between versions and every variant of smoothing, auto clickers, (aka the hardest hack to see) doesn't work in 1.9, reach does the exact same thing between versions, triggerbot doesn't change much aside from timing the hits, all movement cheats are identical. I am curious why 1.9 is harder to detect hacks in. I would understand that anti cheats may need to be redesigned since the game version is based on something else, but otherwise I don't see any difference.
Because kill aura is timed, it only hits when the cooldown ends, its very natural looking. Whereas in 1.8 its a constant flux of perfect hits every millesecond, its much more obvious to the human eye. Movement cheats are identical. When you click very quickly on a player body it makes a 'hit' noise, if someone is using an autoclicker you can here this noise very very quickly and it never misses a beat because a program is doing it, it's consistently fast.
When you say kill aura I am going to assume you mean ghost aura since standard ka is 100% Noticable, they simply get hits that are outside the hit box, however aimbot glues to the player. If someone lands every hit in 1.9 it seems a little like they are cheating, however in 1.8 it is expected for at least one person to always be hitting the other. In 1.9, idk about you but I don't always have my aim glued to the player, I only make sure that every 0.625 seconds I am hovering over them, in 1.8 on the other hand, you have to constantly be hovering over the other person otherwise you take more KB and do less dps, in 1.9 most people dont have their crosshairs over their enemy all the time, usually only when their weapon is not on cooldown. Thus making it so aimbot looks a little weirder in 1.9.
Auto clickers are pointless in 1.9, and in 1.8, without an anticheat, from 3rd person perspective, no one can tell they are auto clicking unless you see 10 quadrillion particles flying off you, but a 14 cps auto clicker is almost undetectable without an anticheat.
Gainfullterror
Forum Professional
I don't know about you, but I'd say it's way easier to spot them in 1.9+.
Sounds aside, sometimes you can tell it's kill aura just by how regular the hits are. Nobody that I've fought before, hits in a completely regular manner.
Everybody is bound to miss a hit or two, resulting in the interval between hits being extremely irregular. With a regular kill aura, it's almost perfect (due to connection and stuff, it'll never be perfect). Of course, this isn't enough proof sometimes, but it is quite the red flag if you're fighting someone.
I actually agree with this. Hackusating shouldn't be forbidden, but a chat filter for that is a good idea!
Lmao, #english discord in a nutshell
Similar threads
- Poll
Latest profile posts
BicolourSine41 wrote on Reesle's profile.
No one can say happy birthday here on the correct date, wait im checking