I've personally never been kicked and I have done this so many times. It seems like the devs have been fixing several bugs as there are less complaints these days.Try OP EW+gitterclick. After a while you will get kicked...
I've personally never been kicked and I have done this so many times. It seems like the devs have been fixing several bugs as there are less complaints these days.Try OP EW+gitterclick. After a while you will get kicked...
2 things,the person who started this thread is very ungrateful, they clearly don't know how hard it is and how many hours have to be invested to make a good anti-cheat. ( dunno how to quote :() I agree, its hard to make one. Even know he could just stop playing Cubecraft (not recommended)
the person who started this thread is very ungrateful, they clearly don't know how hard it is and how many hours have to be invested to make a good anti-cheat. ( dunno how to quote :() I agree, its hard to make one. Even know he could just stop playing Cubecraft (not recommended)
Technically it's a fact, not an opinion... ;)thanks for sharing my opinion ;)
Technically it's a fact, not an opinion... ;)
Why are you outraging. I want to see you develop an anti cheat better then CubeCraft's, and mine. If you are interested in a contest PM me.They better do, instead of wasting their time on some kind of halloween game where you just have to pointlessly walk around in darkness for half an hour
Yeah I suggested this too.Well they need to test their anticheat somehow and even though I've suggested for a private server to test it on this way will help improve it the fastest
because they are constantly working on the new anticheat.[/QUOT*E]
*Cough* halloween game *Cough*
They could test it on a private server instead, as @POWER_RANGER suggested.-Beta anti cheat
Yeah, but some still do and it ruins the game for them.-Not everyone gets effected by this
No. No it's not. At least not for me. I explained why above somewhere.-It's better than nothing
If course I know, but the point is, if you for instance worked hours and hours on a, let's say chocolate cake. A lot of people want the chocolate cake, they wait for the chocolate cake and they like chocolate cake, Then, after all these hours of work you decide to taste the chocolate cake for a test. It's burnt and tastes horrible. Yes, a lot of hard work went into the cake, and a lot of people want the cake, but would you give them a burnt cake? You know, you could poison some of these people. Hope this explains my POV.they clearly don't know how hard it is and how many hours have to be invested to make a good anti-cheat.
In case you didn't know, I'm not outraging, just trying to explain my POV on this. It's called criticism. criticism helps to improve stuff. If people never get to hear what they did wrong, then how is it ever going to be better? I made this thread to explain why I disagree with the new anticheat, not to rage on devs. just raging on someone is pointless. PS: No, thanks for the offer, I'm not interested in a contest.Why are you outraging. I want to see you develop an anti cheat better then CubeCraft's, and mine. If you are interested in a contest PM me.
My problem is, people continuously ask for a good anticheat, they tell us to be patient and that they are constantly working on it, but then suddenly I discover that instead of working on a (good) anticheat, they have been working on a halloween game. Yes of course, new games are good, but the problem of the anticheat kicking normal players is still there. First fix the bugs before creating an entirely new gamemode.They made the game for fun. If you do not enjoy it we do not want to hear it, I am pretty sure most of us are just annoyed by your ranting.
do that all the time no kickTry OP EW+gitterclick. After a while you will get kicked...
saying "remove it" is a suggestion ?o_O it is a simple suggestion where a devs answer could be "yes" or "no" and if the dev wishes they can explainI understand your frustration. Devs are aware of the issue of players being kicked falsely. We're hoping it's being worked on (most likely it is). We just ask for your patience. :)
This thread will remain open as he does have a suggestion.