lol if i did, it would be the same as sentinelTry to make an anti-cheat by yourself, LOL
lol if i did, it would be the same as sentinelTry to make an anti-cheat by yourself, LOL
You where cheating, you hit 7 blocks away, thats probably a ghost client.
Then, do it. You could win some money from Spigot if you reach sentinel’s quality :)lol if i did, it would be the same as sentinel
The anti cheats aren't always correct. They can try to fix things, but it won't be 100% perfect.I have been banned by the Sentinel for cheating in PvP FFA, while I am not using hacks or cheats.
I KNOW I have to make an appeal for this, but those appeals are always ignored (like last time an account got banned for hacks, which I did not have).
I have seen and heard people being banned for cheating while they did not have any hacks multiple times.
This means the anti-cheat system is not working correctly.
It is quite stupid that people (including me) are unfairly getting banned for hacking.
I am asking a staff member to take this issue seriously and also look into my ban appeal.
You can ask people in PvP FFA and they will say that I am not hacking.
My username on MC: SchaapKind123
Please take this seriously, because this can happen to anyone!
No one wants to be banned unfairly, because the anti-cheat is not working properly.
If you don't like the server, then leave ;)I GOT FALSE BANNED 10000000000000000000 TIMES conclusion: anitcheat suck harder than the server
Well, CrazyManJr only works on Sentinel...members have hard jobs to do, and they can't work on everything at once.
This is the worst thing I’ve ever heard. “Sentinel isn’t 100% perfect”!!? Then, why do we have it? Just imagine to be 1 of that guys who are unfairly banned. Your appeal won’t be accepted. You’ll have to wait a week to play again!The anti cheats aren't always correct. They can try to fix things, but it won't be 100% perfect.
Did you read the rules and Lezappen's profile page?staff wannabe alerttt
why I should?Did you read the rules and Lezappen's profile page?
Banea a jugadores inocentes.Yo he visto por ahora que no tiene fallos y va muy bien.
Humans can easily get 15 cps even without butterfly clicking. They aren't cheating lol why do they deserver getting banned just because they can click fast. It is technically a bug, the purpose of an anticheat is to ban cheaters and not ban legit players, banning people who click fast.now they are more of a freak occurrence
and actually quite a few of them aren't false bans but just due to the player not knowing that Having an insanely high CPS could lead to Sentinel banning you and no that isn't a bug
Spam clicking really fast itself isn't bannable
doing it at speeds no human should ever be able to do at is a whole new thing
Hitting 7 blocks away is not a "ghost" client thingYou where cheating, you hit 7 blocks away, thats probably a ghost client.
That video you look really sketchy in, aside from the very far hit at the end your block hitting looks really wierd, as if you were using either an auto block or an autoclicker for right click. That ban you received was fully appropriate.
Trust me, 99/100 sentinel appeals are something among the lines of "dear kobe craft I did not have any way to hack". We can't do anything with that kind of appeals. It's useless so it gets denied. We need players to describe very detailled what happened, so Crazyman can look into it. Not just saying I bought rango so I want unbanno cuz it was falso.I do agree with the fact that anti-cheat appeals are handled poorly. Appeals of players who got banned by Sentinel are getting denied while they weren't cheating.
and that also happends a lot ^ and players lying about the fact that they cheated.now they are more of a freak occurrence
and actually quite a few of them aren't false bans but just due to the player not knowing that Having an insanely high CPS could lead to Sentinel banning you and no that isn't a bug