Bigger Parties

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

Now, I have a gold rank, but I still feel like the party sizes for stone ranked people is too small and too unfair. Lets say you have like 4-5 friends. You cant have all of them together. So that way someone is always left out. So I think that there should be an added players to parties for stone ranked people. I think maybe at least 2-5 added players for stone ranks. Or just no limit for any ranked players. Then no one would have to be left out. But then there could be a limit where you can only have like 5 pending party invites. Just to make this more fair.

-Hank

 

[Injunction]

BUY A RANK
That gives you more party slots

 

[Aurora]

I do feel like the current party size limit for stone ranks is pretty small, but the argument of having a bigger friend list than party size can go for any rank. I think there has to be a limit because I can imagine it getting a bit chaotic to have an extremely large party. Also, having different party size limits for each rank is one of the few things that differentiates the value of each rank and adds more value and appeal to higher ranks (which the server needs to add more of).

A solution to the issue of not enough party space is to ask a friend with a higher rank to add people to the party.

 

[TriangleAttack]

I think it's fine. You can buy a better rank if you're really in need of more party slots.
Stone seems fine. It has 10 friend slots and a few party slots. That's good enough for every player who hasn't donated for perks like others had. It also makes buying a rank more appealing.

 

[BlueQuakeAdmin_]

Like what @TriangleAttack and @jollow250 said. Buy a higher rank, it will give you more friend and party slots. Each rank's party and friend perks are fine as it is now.

 

[Ducky]

You have bigger party slots if you buy a higher rank. The current slots for all the ranks are fine. And indeed, you could ask someone else with a higher rank. For example: most of the time I'm the owner of the party which @SrKlompenstein is also in. Though, it doesn't really matter as it's only a party with 2 players, but in other cases I'm the party owner too.

 

[XiiKa]

I think the amount of slots for the parties are fine. Especially when you see how much you pay for each rank, there has to be a difference between each rank.
What my friends and I usually do, is just switch the owner of the party to invite more people.

And besides that, no one wants a huge party that cant even fit in one team?!

 

[Despacito 2]

Adding one more slot to each rank would be nice. That way no rank would feel left out when they increase the party size just a little.

What my friends and I usually do, is just switch the owner of the party to invite more people.

How does that even work if the owner of the party is an Obsidian rank or is it some sort of glitch?

 

[je_moederisbae]

If you have a low rank, it is indeed little. But if they are going to increase is that once again a function less for the high ranks so they must have it might yet increase by 1 or 2 people but no more.

 

[XiiKa]

How does that even work if the owner of the party is an Obsidian rank or is it some sort of glitch?

No i mean, when for example a Iron Rank is the owner of the party, we just switch the owner to a higher ranker (Diamond or smth). So we can invite more people.

 

[RayzMC]

BUY A RANK
That gives you more party slots

Not everyone can afford one/let their parents buy them one.

I think 3 players only is actually quite small.
Maybe just add 1-2 more for each rank including stone.

 

[Gaaabb]

Now, I have a gold rank, but I still feel like the party sizes for stone ranked people is too small and too unfair. Lets say you have like 4-5 friends. You cant have all of them together. So that way someone is always left out. So I think that there should be an added players to parties for stone ranked people. I think maybe at least 2-5 added players for stone ranks. Or just no limit for any ranked players. Then no one would have to be left out. But then there could be a limit where you can only have like 5 pending party invites. Just to make this more fair.

-Hank

Cubecraft want to make ranks interested, that members gonna buy rank upgraides etc.

 

[Injunction]

Not everyone can afford one/let their parents buy them one.

I think 3 players only is actually quite small.
Maybe just add 1-2 more for each rank including stone.

I realise that but it is a reason to buy a rank for other players
that is a perk for ranks
also you realise with the party system you don't even need to have a full party to have that
just do a simple thing with /fmsg to tell them when you are coming
by giving them 5 you are literally giving them equal to a lapis rank

 

[GeldHaftige]

BUY A RANK
That gives you more party slots

He has a rank. He wants no limit for donators.

I disagree. I find it unfear for obsidian ranks opposite iron rankers. Bigger parties would be Nice, But No limit?

 

[Injunction]

, but I still feel like the party sizes for stone ranked people is too small and too unfair.

He has a rank. He wants no limit for donators.

Fake news I say

 

[Facelurite]

Stone ranks ahould at leastbe able to create a party of 5.

I heard the word 'unlimited party' being thrown around here , ill just say that if that were added , one needn't DDOS to crash the whole server

 

[RayzMC]

by giving them 5 you are literally giving them equal to a lapis rank

Which was why I said raise the ammount by 1 or 2 to each rank, including stone.

 

[ChasingRainbows]

Not everyone can afford one/let their parents buy them one.

I think 3 players only is actually quite small.
Maybe just add 1-2 more for each rank including stone.

Then, frankly, that sucks for them.

 

[zHeavy]

Buy a higher rank, it will give you more party slots. :)

 

[Injunction]

Which was why I said raise the ammount by 1 or 2 to each rank, including stone.

Yes So I buy a rank for more party slots
but than didn't have to buy a rank in the first place
Cheap Cheap Cheap