Game monitors for hackers

[Spinnypoo]

Hi there,

I know the title.. But however I think this is a good idea. First of all this is very trying on the amount of Devs/mods etc etc but however I think it is a good idea! So I am not aiming this by saying that a staff member has to be in every game(s) what I am saying is that a Person that has been banned for example: "HiIamDeb" was banned for such and such so when the ban/mute is over a staff member shadows the player to make sure that they do not hack again. I know the pros and cons of this idea. Pros being:

• Not as many hackers
• Better games with not as many hackers

Con's being:

• High demand of staff members
• Lot's of pressure on staff members

I hope this made sense if it did not you can always question me in the comments :)

 

[Spinnypoo]

I am sorry if I got anything wrong of is it did not make sense! It's late! And I am tiered!

 

[CommunistCactus]

Ehhmm no.

Staff have better things to do.
Also, in the time a staff spectates a game, he/she could done 20x as much by just checking the reports of players.

I'll explain it once, here it comes. We have around 38 staff members who can ban players and more then 200k players a day, got it? ;)

We can do 20 reports in the time we have to spectate a hacker in game..

 

[YouAlwaysTim]

So your saying staff need to be able to spactate a hacker in game? I think staffs are already busy enough and they aren't robots who can spactate all day So -1
and not all staffs are online all day and I don't know if this will be a positive suggestion

 

[Jeff_Bllkth]

But if that person is afk for 10 minutes and then he moves....? Staff couldn't wait anyways

 

[Thaus]

1: Staff can't join games.
2: it's a waste of time
3: why should they only do this cuz of one person if they could do so much more?

 

[Brittley]

I'd rather staff do reports and ban 10+ hackers in the time span of them following one person who may or may not be hacking anymore. Also a lot of staff are busy and have lives as well :)