why dont you think about how you could kill them instead ;^) jkToday I was playing Skywars and I'm a noob and I had to play against the real MVP's. So I thought what maybe would help is a ranking like:
Thank you :DHello steve :p I'm really backing you up on this ranking system, many threads have asked this before.
+1
so when someones played enough they have to play vs the strongest, then also when they systems been in long enough everyone will be in mvp and the system was pointless0-50 wins = noob
51-150 = normal
151+ = mvp
something like that to balance the game
I think it should be based of the Kills/Death ratio rather than the amount of wins.Let me do something about this cause this will get abused
Pros will join noob to get kills....
0-50 wins = noob
51-150 = normal
151+ = mvp
something like that to balance the game
it should be part kill and win ratio.I think it should be based of the Kills/Death ratio rather than the amount of wins.
No because it isn't on plays it is on wins and yeah at the end everyone ends on MVP but they are than all good in PvP so it worked I thinkso when someones played enough they have to play vs the strongest, then also when they systems been in long enough everyone will be in mvp and the system was pointless
If it is say; 150 wins to get into the mvp group, and someone who has the skill of someone in the noob group has 5,000 games played, they could easily have had 150 wins and be having to be playing vs the highest skilled players, all this does is group players by how many games theyve played not by their skill.No because it isn't on plays it is on wins and yeah at the end everyone ends on MVP but they are than all good in PvP so it worked I think