GLOWSTONE TREES PLZZ

[liixhulk]

#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays

 

[liixhulk]

#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays
#make glowstone trees like normal tree where u mine the stem and it the glowstone decays

thanks

 

[xYeetus]

Yes pls

 

[FnigePython]

bruh what

 

[FuriousCorgi481]

That doesn't happen because glowstone decay is not a standard Vanilla mechanic

 

[vasui]

First of all you don't even have any pictures on how it looks.

second of all your spamming, which isn't really smart since it's against the rules

and third of all it doesn't look good.

 

[FuriousCorgi481]

On top of the problems of coding Glowstone decay it would no longer be a good light source for farms and bridges

 

[liixhulk]

On top of the problems of coding Glowstone decay it would no longer be a good light source for farms and bridges

no u mine the stem (cobble walls) then the glowstone falls

 

[FuriousCorgi481]

So do you want to code that? Would you be willing? If not, you don't want it enough.

 

[Gemmmmie]

I think the trees are fine as they are. It would mean a lot of additional coding which isn't apart of Vanilla Minecraft.

 

[FBX 17]

1) Normal trees only drop saplings, so by implementing decay "like normal trees" you wouldn't get any glowstone, which completely defeats the point of glowstone roots.
2) Even if the decaying glowstone "leaves" did drop dust, you should be using fortune on the glowstone, so making them decay would lead to a loss in output.
3) Coding this in would be extremely difficult and would raise some issues - either you store tree locations (which would be extremely resource-intensive), or you make all glowstone decay around cobblestone walls (which would disrupt many people's builds whilst still being very resource-intensive).
4) The Bedrock server only has 3 active developers (to my knowledge) for all the games on the network, so a small QoL problem with a difficult fix is not going to happen any time soon.
5) Don't spam on the forums (or anywhere actually).

 

[Deleted member 491790]

1) Normal trees only drop saplings, so by implementing decay "like normal trees" you wouldn't get any glowstone, which completely defeats the point of glowstone roots.
2) Even if the decaying glowstone "leaves" did drop dust, you should be using fortune on the glowstone, so making them decay would lead to a loss in output.
3) Coding this in would be extremely difficult and would raise some issues - either you store tree locations (which would be extremely resource-intensive), or you make all glowstone decay around cobblestone walls (which would disrupt many people's builds whilst still being very resource-intensive).
4) The Bedrock server only has 3 active developers (to my knowledge) for all the games on the network, so a small QoL problem with a difficult fix is not going to happen any time soon.
5) Don't spam on the forums (or anywhere actually).

Sums this post up exactly, though I will add it also would be a waste of Cubecraft's time with unnecessary changes, and there is literally no reason to add this at all, don't know where this came from tbh.