Java Higher rewards for maps with more player slots

[LordSidi0us]

Hello fellow EggWars players.
I'm suggesting a 50% increase in rewards for Solo maps with 10, or 12 people and for Team EggWars maps with teams of 3 at least and higher, and here's why:
1-Most people avoid maps with more player slots, as they are usually bigger and the games are always filling up very slowly, just because of this reason.
2-Fighting for an hour or two on maps like Tea Party should pay off better, as it is way more challenging than let's say a game on City. Remember, teams of 5 versus teams of 2.
3-It will motivate players to play EggWars more in general, and it will attract them to the big maps again, as they will see point in grinding them, instead of only choosing the smallest ones to save time and avoid the long-wait.
As an EggWars lover and grinder, I'm always a little sad to see almost no one playing on anything that's not teams of 2, 3 and 4, or in Solo's case, Elven, Tentacles, End (exception, as it's islands are connected) or Desert.
I strongly believe the 375 XP and 100 points I suggest aren't overpriced and will only make more people play the gamode.
I'm all ears for your thoughts on the matter.

 

[Rocks1]

I think this is a good idea just the XP raise should be 25% instead of 50%.

 

[LordSidi0us]

I think this is a good idea just the XP raise should be 25% instead of 50%.

I believe 312,5 wouldn't make that big of a difference.
@xAmazinq @GiGaGekkies, what's your reasoning? Is it the percentage, or?

 

[Amazinq]

I believe 312,5 wouldn't make that big of a difference.
@xAmazinq @GiGaGekkies, what's your reasoning? Is it the percentage, or?

Hey, I simply believe that the amount of experience and points should be exactly the same for all maps, I can understand that there are maps with fewer players which could be faster but I don't think it's like that in all cases, since many games can be extended depending on what kind of players there are and other factors.

I think it would be fair and convenient to leave it as it is now, the same rewards for all maps.

 

[LordSidi0us]

Hey, I simply believe that the amount of experience and points should be exactly the same for all maps, I can understand that there are maps with fewer players which could be faster but I don't think it's like that in all cases, since many games can be extended depending on what kind of players there are and other factors.

I think it would be fair and convenient to leave it as it is now, the same rewards for all maps.

I understand, and it really does depend on the people who play, but the chance of a long game on a big map is always considerably higher than any other smaller map. Let's put it that way, it happens like 4 out of 5 times.

 

[Matriox]

250exp is already wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy to high IMO compared to other games.

possibility for 50exp for a 40min game of Tower Defence?

Yea no thanks, not making the network even more unfair in terms of levels

In my opinion anyway