Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net

Lukedog1645

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2014
234
46
103
21
Used to before eula like 10 donors would be on kit pvp now none ever join.i know u guys can't do anything bout the Eula but when is the points system thing gonna come out?
 

LaserDolphin77

Dedicated Member
Oct 20, 2013
2,784
1,275
244
Sure, it's "crumbling" for the donators, but think about the stones out there who can finally play with an equal chance of winning against the donators now? That's why they're joining so much more often, and it goes to show that the donators only liked being OP on the server, not actually trying to win fair fights between each other. I'm on the stone's side on this one, when I'm ever in kitpvp, before the EULA changes, I'd normally go with level 1 kits, and see how well I'd do against, others, which will actually test more of your skill than fighting with things like protection IV diamond armor. If the donators only came on to be OP on the server, it's not really a gameplay, then. It's just donators who rule the arenas. I've seen more players on kitpvp after the EULA than I have in a while. Shortly after CCG complied with the EULA's terms, I saw that kitpvp 1 AND 2 were both full of players, which made me feel glad that the stones can finally play this kind of gameplay without having to die every 10-20 seconds.
 

Trickmaster

Dedicated Member
May 23, 2014
1,175
958
188
Potato Heaven
Sure, it's "crumbling" for the donators, but think about the stones out there who can finally play with an equal chance of winning against the donators now? That's why they're joining so much more often, and it goes to show that the donators only liked being OP on the server, not actually trying to win fair fights between each other. I'm on the stone's side on this one, when I'm ever in kitpvp, before the EULA changes, I'd normally go with level 1 kits, and see how well I'd do against, others, which will actually test more of your skill than fighting with things like protection IV diamond armor. If the donators only came on to be OP on the server, it's not really a gameplay, then. It's just donators who rule the arenas. I've seen more players on kitpvp after the EULA than I have in a while. Shortly after CCG complied with the EULA's terms, I saw that kitpvp 1 AND 2 were both full of players, which made me feel glad that the stones can finally play this kind of gameplay without having to die every 10-20 seconds.
Oh. My. God. You just stated my thoughts on the issue perfectly. Good job, there is finally someone who supports the stones on this ;) +1

P.S. How is it pvp when all the donators do is fight for a few seconds, then eat a golden apple that you don't have which takes away all the work you did for the past straight 5 minutes, and they have 32 of them :/ That's not skilled pvp.
 

Sophie

Forum Professional
May 1, 2014
8,960
17,874
624
26
Arendine Sink
Sure, it's "crumbling" for the donators, but think about the stones out there who can finally play with an equal chance of winning against the donators now? That's why they're joining so much more often, and it goes to show that the donators only liked being OP on the server, not actually trying to win fair fights between each other. I'm on the stone's side on this one, when I'm ever in kitpvp, before the EULA changes, I'd normally go with level 1 kits, and see how well I'd do against, others, which will actually test more of your skill than fighting with things like protection IV diamond armor. If the donators only came on to be OP on the server, it's not really a gameplay, then. It's just donators who rule the arenas. I've seen more players on kitpvp after the EULA than I have in a while. Shortly after CCG complied with the EULA's terms, I saw that kitpvp 1 AND 2 were both full of players, which made me feel glad that the stones can finally play this kind of gameplay without having to die every 10-20 seconds.
*claps for 45 minutes straight, rips shirt off and howls at the moon* Perfectly said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s__a__r__a__h

Joshmctosh

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2014
754
177
118
24
Somewhere in the world...
Exactly! Their armor and weapons is already OP enough! I suggested that emerald donors got 2 gapples and obby got 3. All ranks below just get the perks that makes them win every time
 

BubbleGalore

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2014
222
71
103
I would actually go on Kit PvP now, since it was like all equal, its more skill now then like donors having OP stuff. It was the first time it was actually fun for once :D
 

SpritySpritz

Dedicated Member
Mar 26, 2014
2,266
860
189
Sure, it's "crumbling" for the donators, but think about the stones out there who can finally play with an equal chance of winning against the donators now? That's why they're joining so much more often, and it goes to show that the donators only liked being OP on the server, not actually trying to win fair fights between each other. I'm on the stone's side on this one, when I'm ever in kitpvp, before the EULA changes, I'd normally go with level 1 kits, and see how well I'd do against, others, which will actually test more of your skill than fighting with things like protection IV diamond armor. If the donators only came on to be OP on the server, it's not really a gameplay, then. It's just donators who rule the arenas. I've seen more players on kitpvp after the EULA than I have in a while. Shortly after CCG complied with the EULA's terms, I saw that kitpvp 1 AND 2 were both full of players, which made me feel glad that the stones can finally play this kind of gameplay without having to die every 10-20 seconds.
+1000000000 <3 I 10000% agree. Amazement

Donators. If you dont like playing kitpvp JUST bc u die, ur not a true.

Me and couple of my friends play in kitpvp II. We try to protect the island from the incoming enemies, and it is really fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaserDolphin77

AquaaXx

Dedicated Member
Apr 1, 2014
3,610
1,272
248
Africa
I Was thinking of creating a thread about vanity options for donators, ect coloured leathered dye for what ever donator rank you are and cool perks like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sophie

FLYING_PIANO66

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
802
242
118
24
I completly agree with Laser...but on the other side...even though most of us..(I hope) didnt completly donate for the perks...we still donated and that was the reason why we had these perks...Im on both sides...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sophie

Sophie

Forum Professional
May 1, 2014
8,960
17,874
624
26
Arendine Sink
I completly agree with Laser...but on the other side...even though most of us..(I hope) didnt completly donate for the perks...we still donated and that was the reason why we had these perks...Im on both sides...
It was suggested frequently that donators could have their own lobby for kitpvp, and stones could have their own lobby, but i don't see much being achieved from this. Just seems like a lot of work for something that will likely get boring after a few hours anyways...
 

MadGab210

Dedicated Member
Jan 29, 2014
1,401
1,255
224
22
Chicago
This isn't true at all, Kit pvp 2 is ALWAYS full and plenty of donors still come on! And also, I know many people obviously don't like the EULA but CCG can't fix that. Kit pvp is still the same old kit pvp. And, its what is should be. Its now more equal for everyone.
 

Terrarialover11

Forum Expert
Jan 30, 2014
1,503
2,185
253
22
Crazy Land (I GOT THE COOKIES :D)
They are working on the point system for kits as we speak but it won't just happen in a day I imagine this will take a little while longer but might be out soon and does it really matter that donors are on? I mean there are usually tons of stones when I join the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkbubble

kkbubble

Dedicated Member
Mar 17, 2014
1,601
766
188
24
The chair in between good and evil
It was suggested frequently that donators could have their own lobby for kitpvp, and stones could have their own lobby, but i don't see much being achieved from this. Just seems like a lot of work for something that will likely get boring after a few hours anyways...
i would go on a donor only kit pvp lobby....but now it would be useless because even though donors wouldn't have a gameplay advantage against the stones, the stones wouldn't be allowed on it which changed their gameplay and therefore is against the EULA.
 

Pedr_Davies

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2014
14
2
78
25
Murica
I'm a stone and I hate having equality. Its boring. I keep fighting the same thing over and over. Facing OP people was fun cause It would be a bigger challenge for people that are amazing at pvp. Now all we have are people that sometimes buy the OP diamond armor.
 

ModernRevolution

Dedicated Member
Oct 23, 2013
4,525
1,765
248
ςяαzу ℓαи∂
Just because donators aren't playing doesn't mean stones aren't having fun. But yes, there is a decrease in the usage of kit pvp by donators, and I also agree with Pedr_Davies when he says it's a little boring. But I've always seen at least one person in full diamond gear who provides a challenge, and there are also those who are good at pvp on there who make it interesting. But I don't really see the point in this thread, just to discuss the decrease in donators? They can still play, nothings stopping them at all.
 

emiraati

Dedicated Member
Feb 2, 2014
1,362
905
188
24
United Arab Emirates
Guys remember, donator are not gods or anything, stones should have fun too, most of the donators are horrible at pvp anyway lol. Stones can finally have fun at kit pvp without getting killed by a guy with OP kits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terrarialover11

ItsYaBoyJavid

Forum Expert
Jun 25, 2014
2,690
2,565
358
23
Earth
I think that kit-PvP is fine, heck more people Probally play it more now that it's equal. because half of ccg is stone.
 
Members Online

Members online

Latest profile posts

Thank you for 6.1K! ❤️
Apparently I hack IN PARKOUR LOLOLOL
IMG_6919.png

😂🤣

After uttering those 3 words, the dude left and gave me a free win xD
A picture of my cat sleeping having kitty dreams
1000053259.jpg
kfccaleb wrote on WayneX4's profile.
You can now have a follow after I played with you!
How do you make spoilers with a name?
Top Bottom