Escalated Make the elytra unbreakable. (FFA)

[matcha]

There are no good reasons not to implement it.

Actually one reason:
Shooting people as a archer :>

What has removing to do with a ability on a elytra?

You're saying that because the archer kit is too strong, especially in wings, it is one reason why this wouldn't/shouldn't be implemented. Me saying

That's like saying why don't we remove the <<insert kit>> because it's too overpowered.

Is simply pointing out why your reasoning is flawed.

 

[Blocky]

You're saying that because the archer kit is too strong, especially in wings, it is one reason why this wouldn't/shouldn't be implemented. Me saying

You're saying that because the archer kit is too strong, especially in wings, it is one reason why this wouldn't/shouldn't be implemented. Me saying



Is simply pointing out why your reasoning is flawed.

It wouldn't matter how strong archer is. Unbreakable elytra's give the option to kill people while recieving almost no damage at all in many cases.

 

[matcha]

It wouldn't matter how strong archer is. Unbreakable elytra's give the option to kill people while recieving almost no damage at all in many cases.

So? You can do the same without an elytra, it's about skills at that point. Nothing unfair about that. There's literally no reason for your main mode of getting around a map to be a hindrance to you because it keeps breaking.

 

[StevesAreOP]

31x Yes
0x No
Staff, what are you waiting for??

 

[Ruisdier]

31x Yes
0x No
Staff, what are you waiting for??

Thanks, 34 now :eek:

 

[RqktByMax_]

i agree u, i do not play alot FFA but its not funny if ur elytra break, the elytra is the important item in FFA with wings.

 

[Ruisdier]

i agree u, i do not play alot FFA but its not funny if ur elytra break, the elytra is the important item in FFA with wings.

Thanks dude. It's really annoying when it breaks

 

[Ruisdier]

I swear, this has 39 votes for yes and 0 for no. I know I'm whining a bit but c'mon. There are suggestion added with more votes for no than for yes

 

[Lezappen]

I swear, this has 39 votes for yes and 0 for no. I know I'm whining a bit but c'mon. There are suggestion added with more votes for no than for yes

This post has already been escalated and has only been up for a few weeks, just because it isn't implemented yet doesn't mean it's being ignored.

 

[Ruisdier]

This post has already been escalated and has only been up for a few weeks, just because it isn't implemented yet doesn't mean it's being ignored.

I know but I want to know if the staff is arguing if this should get implemented or not so that I know how my suggestion is doing

 

[Lezappen]

I know but I want to know if the staff is arguing if this should get implemented or not so that I know how my suggestion is doing

This is a good suggestion and it does have a lot of positive feedback, I don't see why it wouldn't be added.
We don't argue about it's implementation we just kinda go "hey, management, look at this suggestion, isn't it cool? I'll just leave this here for you to look at some time in the future when you have the time"
We cannot tell you if the suggestion is going to be implemented (soon or at all) because there can be delays in production and priorities do change and we don't want to make any false promises.
Imagine in 3 weeks FFA was planned to be replaced with something else (it isn't AFAIK) there wouldn't be any point investing development time into a game that is planned for expiration.
You submitted a good suggestion that has made it to management who have now aknowledged it, you have done what you can, the rest is on us.