It really does. People at their islands can't go anywhere and you're just standing there lmaoI just see it as a really good strategy, it sets it apart from base camping because it doesn't lock you in a stalemate with the enemy.
It really does. People at their islands can't go anywhere and you're just standing there lmaoI just see it as a really good strategy, it sets it apart from base camping because it doesn't lock you in a stalemate with the enemy.
I just see it as a really good strategy, it sets it apart from base camping because it doesn't lock you in a stalemate with the enemy.
It really does. People at their islands can't go anywhere and you're just standing there lmao
If the game lasts four hours, it was probably an amazing game.
I think that's rather subjective. I like Eggwars games that take their time. But if I'm going to spend over an hour because some guy wants to camp or mid camp, I rather just leave Eggwars as a whole.
Am I the only person who likes building massive fortresses?
Well. Can't say I've never done that. But it's pretty annoying, especially if the game is dragged on for hours because of that. I remember playing a game that lasted for hours just because of campers. I don't want to play games like that.
It really does. People at their islands can't go anywhere and you're just standing there lmao
Exactly why its a good strategy, you see in base camping there is literally nothing for both of you to do other than sit there until one of you makes a move. No one wants to make a move because that person usually dies. In mid camping the mid campers cut everyone else off from their resources which is extremely strategic and well thought out. Eventually, your enemy will be severely under geared and you can effortlessly go over to them and win. It is not strategic to sit at your base and wait for the enemy to quit, that is what we call "stalling". Overall, the "mid camping" strategy IMO is just a really good way of playing the game.
It's a strategy in a sense. Not exactly like base camping is a strategy. But there should be ways to counter it.
It's completely broken, which is the point we're going at. I can kill 70% of hackers, 15% of mid campers. Don't you think that;s a problem?Exactly why its a good strategy, you see in base camping there is literally nothing for both of you to do other than sit there until one of you makes a move. No one wants to make a move because that person usually dies. In mid camping the mid campers cut everyone else off from their resources which is extremely strategic and well thought out. Eventually, your enemy will be severely under geared and you can effortlessly go over to them and win. It is not strategic to sit at your base and wait for the enemy to quit, that is what we call "stalling". Overall, the "mid camping" strategy IMO is just a really good way of playing the game.
But it isn't good for the game overall. Hacking is a good strategy because it allows to win easily, doesn't mean it's good to have lots of hackers.Exactly why its a good strategy, you see in base camping there is literally nothing for both of you to do other than sit there until one of you makes a move. No one wants to make a move because that person usually dies. In mid camping the mid campers cut everyone else off from their resources which is extremely strategic and well thought out. Eventually, your enemy will be severely under geared and you can effortlessly go over to them and win. It is not strategic to sit at your base and wait for the enemy to quit, that is what we call "stalling". Overall, the "mid camping" strategy IMO is just a really good way of playing the game.
Took the words right out of my mouth.But it isn't good for the game overall. Hacking is a good strategy because it allows to win easily, doesn't mean it's good to have lots of hackers.
Mid camping doesn't actually require that much skill if you have a team that works with you. Just rush for 12 diamonds and gold, run back. You basically already won. Not much skill if you ask me.Exactly why its a good strategy, you see in base camping there is literally nothing for both of you to do other than sit there until one of you makes a move. No one wants to make a move because that person usually dies. In mid camping the mid campers cut everyone else off from their resources which is extremely strategic and well thought out. Eventually, your enemy will be severely under geared and you can effortlessly go over to them and win. It is not strategic to sit at your base and wait for the enemy to quit, that is what we call "stalling". Overall, the "mid camping" strategy IMO is just a really good way of playing the game.
But it isn't good for the game overall. Hacking is a good strategy because it allows to win easily, doesn't mean it's good to have lots of hackers.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Mid camping doesn't actually require that much skill if you have a team that works with you. Just rush for 12 diamonds and gold, run back. You basically already won. Not much skill if you ask me.
It's completely broken, which is the point we're going at. I can kill 70% of hackers, 15% of mid campers. Don't you think that;s a problem?
Tell me the strategy.I attempted to mid camp with a well thought out strategy, and it didn't work.
Tell me the strategy.