You can use them for building and for walls with a gap to shoot through. There are lots of uses for this block and some are mentioned by the others above.
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Normal 2 More Iron than hay & Compared To The Uselessness of slabs it doesn't matter
because you just need a cake there is no point of slabs
also I am pretty sure if you have a bow and a wall you can afford a cake for crying out loud
Yeah, okay. In that case I understand you. But, you can also build bridges with normal blocks (sandstone), so that's why I don't really see the problem.
Now, with cakes that cost 4 iron in op (i think its ten in normal) you cannot even build a bridge with that, you cannot build stuff with cakes, the only that you can build is food. With cakes you cannot build in air, and you cannot build more floor and not a wall, you can place it in the wall i get that, but there are lots of other things you cannot do.
Cakes are there to have food placed on the floor so you can just go by and eat it, which saves you inventory space.
That's true, well I think slabs would be cheaper. Also you can easily fall of the bridge you're making because of the logic of Minecraft:rolleyes:. So I don't mind if slabs will not be added.
I would love traps, but I would rather not be teamkilled.
I know you can't build a wall out of cake what you said was use it as a sniping spot which means that the rest of the wall isn't cake Like This (I Know The Example Is Small I Just Didn't want to make it huge)
I know you can't place cake above air that is why sandstone exists
And so is mine, so here's a cute gif of a dog trying to catch a carrot. http://i.imgur.com/arP2Otg.gifv
What I am suggesting is that we expand on your idea of traps, just in a different angle. Also discarding the TNT idea because that runs the risk of completely destroying someone's manmade base, again causing a gamer to quit. We don't want to frustrate players, just add new angles to winning the game.
No, you cannot place cakes in air, so building a bridge isnt as easy, and slabs would be cheaper to buy so those are better in some cases.
And cakes are also pretty expensive compared to regular blocks and what slabs would cost.
how about instead of wiring your own traps we use the magic of PLUGINS to make traps for us? ex an iron pressure plate that acts like a bear trap, a skeleton turret with 10hp, etc. They would probably belong in OP though.
that is why there is the other blocks
firstly you can't confirm that because it isn't added and there were no prices given as well as you didn't make the thread and secondly they really wouldn't be
if we are in OP cake costs 4 iron HAY Costs More
Normal 2 More Iron than hay & Compared To The Uselessness of slabs it doesn't matter
because you just need a cake there is no point of slabs
also I am pretty sure if you have a bow and a wall you can afford a cake for crying out loud
Your message is unnecessary and does not follow our rules. Please keep this in mind before posting your opinions on threads.
Yeah, okay. In that case I understand you. But, you can also build bridges with normal blocks (sandstone), so that's why I don't really see the problem.
I am pretty sure that if slabs are half a block that they will be like 1 iron for 4stacks of slabs.
Now, with cakes that cost 4 iron in op (i think its ten in normal) you cannot even build a bridge with that, you cannot build stuff with cakes, the only that you can build is food. With cakes you cannot build in air, and you cannot build more floor and not a wall, you can place it in the wall i get that, but there are lots of other things you cannot do.
Cakes are there to have food placed on the floor so you can just go by and eat it, which saves you inventory space.
But slabs would be cheeper, and if they get added more uses for it will be found.
That's true, well I think slabs would be cheaper. Also you can easily fall of the bridge you're making because of the logic of Minecraft:rolleyes:. So I don't mind if slabs will not be added.
After reading all the comment I noticed that no one ever though of the fact that this could be used as team killing. (the traps)
I would love traps, but I would rather not be teamkilled.
I am pretty sure that is to OP if sandstone is in less then that
I know you can't build a wall out of cake what you said was use it as a sniping spot which means that the rest of the wall isn't cake Like This (I Know The Example Is Small I Just Didn't want to make it huge)
I know you can't place cake above air that is why sandstone exists
Your post is just as pointless.
And so is mine, so here's a cute gif of a dog trying to catch a carrot. http://i.imgur.com/arP2Otg.gifv
This seems to have a whole world of possibilities, this idea I can get on board with. I can see that the negatives might turn out to be a problem in future games, but with some development and idea discussions, we might be able to work around possible campers. As for the idea of traps, maybe instead of Redstone on the shop, there are sandstone blocks that can be coded into being a disappearing block. This is just an idea but if this becomes a possibility it will reduce the length of games, plus gamers might rage quit if they can't get a trap right. For some redstone traps are bulky, obvious, and frustrating.
What I am suggesting is that we expand on your idea of traps, just in a different angle. Also discarding the TNT idea because that runs the risk of completely destroying someone's manmade base, again causing a gamer to quit. We don't want to frustrate players, just add new angles to winning the game.
Similar threads
- Poll
