When I have a lot of friends online I’m usually surprised, as I don’t have friends. I usually say in the chat if I’m in a party ”damn, 18 friends online” and then we sometimes compare. This means we all count our friends online, which we’re all way too lazy for. A counter for how many friends are online would be great!
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Not really needed but if devs have time or are working on a QOL chat rework anytime soon sure.
No need to be like that dude, maybe it shouldn't be prioritized but dosen't mean it can't be ever added. This is hardly ridiculous.
people can have up to 30 friends online at a time and not everyone can focus so well on reading over 20 or 30 names when they are not after each other
I have 125 friends and a lot of them are online, you want me to sit there and count them? First off it's a simple statistic that's not worth counting manually. Secondly, that's absurd.
But that dosen't mean to deny it so it's not added ever. Not to mention how would server space be an issue?
That's not really being lazy. I don't understand why you are against something rather simple to add, that could be added when developers are not busy.
Your taking this way to seriously and there is no need to be insulting.
Ok, this is very off-topic and silly. Your taking a minor thing way to seriously.
I don't see the difficulty in counting green names, nor do I see the significance. In my opinion, a waste of developer time and this suggestion yields a no from me.
I fully agree with Santa here, it would be a waste if developers time all because you are too lazy to count 3-16 letter names, truly a ridiculous thread.
I need this. Every evening I might have even 20 friends out of my 50 online and as people type in the chat (especially party chat) it's hard to count it, I also get distracted very easily so this would be a lifesaving update for me.
I'm totally not an adhd kid who can't focus for more than 10 seconds
I'm totally not an adhd kid who can't focus for more than 10 seconds
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Not really needed but if devs have time or are working on a QOL chat rework anytime soon sure.
No need to be like that dude, maybe it shouldn't be prioritized but dosen't mean it can't be ever added. This is hardly ridiculous.
It is ridiculous, how lazy must you be to not count a few peoples names, it is absurd.
_a few_
people can have up to 30 friends online at a time and not everyone can focus so well on reading over 20 or 30 names when they are not after each other
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
I have 125 friends and a lot of them are online, you want me to sit there and count them? First off it's a simple statistic that's not worth counting manually. Secondly, that's absurd.
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
But that dosen't mean to deny it so it's not added ever. Not to mention how would server space be an issue?
Yes, dont be lazy just count, 30 names can be counted in no time.
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
That's not really being lazy. I don't understand why you are against something rather simple to add, that could be added when developers are not busy.
Again, this thread highlights how simple minded the human species have become, lazy sloths who thinks everything should be automated.
this would be a quick modification and wouldn't take much work from devs(or really any tbh). This would be a great quality of life addition. +1 from me
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Your taking this way to seriously and there is no need to be insulting.
He does have a point to be fair. Gone are the days of Sypy, Phids and co where innovation was at its peak and the average IQ of a cubecrafter was at an all time high. This unnecessary automation has purged the minds of our fellow men and women.
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Ok, this is very off-topic and silly. Your taking a minor thing way to seriously.
I think developers, as previously stated, should rather spend there time on something that needs more attention over something minor like counting names. If they had more developers, sure, why not assign this to one of them but realistically it's not needed.
Similar threads
