Party Co-Leader

[Shifts]

Great idea! But maybe joining a game should not need approval from the leader, what if the leader is afk?

Um I stated ideas on how to fix that problem lol

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Good idea. But then people could take over the party and kick people. Maybe they could set it where they can do certain things?

+1

 

[Shifts]

Good idea. But then people could take over the party and kick people. Maybe they could set it where they can do certain things?

+1

I basically just want a person that has the same functions as the leader. The leader has to choose the co-leader that the leader trust so that the co-leader won’t just troll the party, but rather help the party.

 

[Injunction]

Who's to say they'd pick a co-leader?
If you were going AFK while being the party leader and thought about choosing a co-leader in the meantime that is just equivalent to the party owner doing /p setowner
also not to mention you are dragging them into the game every time while they are
Yes doing what I just said would do the same but that's why they can just leave the party for the time they are AFK than ask to be reinvited later while using this system they'd always be dragged into a game if the co-leader wanted to and they were AFK
So it really seems pointless since there is the same chance that the party owner would go afk without picking a co-owner and if they'd have remembered to they would have remembered to just do /p setowner without this

 

[Shifts]

Who's to say they'd pick a co-leader?
If you were going AFK while being the party leader and thought about choosing a co-leader in the meantime that is just equivalent to the party owner doing /p setowner
also not to mention you are dragging them into the game every time while they are
Yes doing what I just said would do the same but that's why they can just leave the party for the time they are AFK than ask to be reinvited later while using this system they'd always be dragged into a game if the co-leader wanted to and they were AFK
So it really seems pointless since there is the same chance that the party owner would go afk without picking a co-owner and if they'd have remembered to they would have remembered to just do /p setowner without this

THTS y u choose the co-leader shortly after making the party

 

[Injunction]

THTS y u choose the co-leader shortly after making the party

loops back to issue
forgetting to do so
also it isn't like a party owner is starting up a party just do go AFK 2 games later
most people wouldn't do that because party co-owners would just be an annoyance to have while you are just playing normally

 

[Shifts]

loops back to issue
forgetting to do so
also it isn't like a party owner is starting up a party just do go AFK 2 games later
most people wouldn't do that because party co-owners would just be an annoyance to have while you are just playing normally

If you can give me one reason why this would hurt please tell me bc based on what I said trolling wouldn’t even be an issue the leader can just demote or remove the co leader rank from someone. Also, this is just to prevent problems it wouldn’t create any of the leader disagrees with the co-leaders suggestion than the leader could just deny it. Also, I don’t hink you have ever been in a party before lol