Java Party Co Owner

[_EliteStevee]

So there are now 2 party roles ( i don't suggest to edit them ) they are fine, but could they make a new role called party Co Owner!
What would it look like?


Just the same as everthing.

The permissions
They are able to: Kick members and not to leave and not to set themself owner and to invite other players.

if you have more suggestions, post them here

The owner can also take the co owner off, the second player auto get it, it could be moved to another player.

 

[SpankMeSanta]

Also to invite players and also the ability to join games (useful when the party leader is AFK for some reason)

 

[_EliteStevee]

Also to invite players and also the ability to join games (useful when the party leader is AFK for some reason)

Thank you for the suggestion! :)

 

[ItsDavey_]

Also don’t kick players from the party when they log out, just set a time limit (2 mins or somehing) so you don’t need to reinvite them.

But I agree with this, but would like to have that you can take off the co-owner role from the player If they are randomly kicking players.

 

[ImJunior]

This is a really good idea actually, make a poll about it and let the people vote! :D

 

[_EliteStevee]

Also don’t kick players from the party when they log out, just set a time limit (2 mins or somehing) so you don’t need to reinvite them.

But I agree with this, but would like to have that you can take off the co-owner role from the player If they are randomly kicking players.

Yes, thank you for the the idea, I will add the thing that you can take it off!

 

[_EliteStevee]

This is a really good idea actually, make a poll about it and let the people vote! :D

Done C:

 

[Dutudy]

I really like this idea!

 

[Cutee]

I really like this idea!

Yk you can just like it or vote 'yes' on the poll right?

 

[ImJunior]

Yk you can just like it or vote 'yes' on the poll right?

Yes, you can.

 

[Cutee]

Yes, you can.

That wasn't a question

 

[ImJunior]

That wasn't a question

o lol

 

[Dutudy]

Yk you can just like it or vote 'yes' on the poll right?

I already have voted on the poll

 

[Cutee]

I already have voted on the poll

Then what's the point of saying ''I really like this idea!''? If you like the idea just liket he suggestion.

 

[_Oplex_]

So there are now 2 party roles ( i don't suggest to edit them ) they are fine, but could they make a new role called party Co Owner!
What would it look like?


Just the same as everthing.

The permissions
They are able to: Kick members and not to leave and not to set themself owner and to invite other players.

if you have more suggestions, post them here

The owner can also take the co owner off, the second player auto get it, it could be moved to another player.

CaN I gET HELpeR rENk tO?

 

[_EliteStevee]

CaN I gET HELpeR rENk tO?

No Yoi cEnT!!!!

 

[Gamerfull]

I think it's a good idea, since many times the owner of the party stays afk and we have to wait, I think the co owner should be able to do that.

 

[SoppeJam]

Yes, and add party admins, moderators, helpers and everything else.

Just why? Why isn't the current system not good enough? Why should have 2 people lead? I think this would be pretty stupid since parties on this network aren't that big. Mostly you play with 2, 3 or 4 people. So it isn't to hard for the owner to keep track of what happens and when to kick someone. (Parties with 10 people or above change the story)

So I say no, unless this feature only gets activated when the party is bigger then 5 people.

 

[Deleted member 352903]

Just why? Why isn't the current system not good enough? Why should have 2 people lead? I think this would be pretty stupid since parties on this network aren't that big. Mostly you play with 2, 3 or 4 people. So it isn't to hard for the owner to keep track of what happens and when to kick someone. (Parties with 10 people or above change the story)

It's annoying when the owner suddenly goes afk and you've to wait for him for 10 minuts. Yeah, you can leave the party, but then you've to invite everyone and it's annoying

 

[_EliteStevee]

Yes, and add party admins, moderators, helpers and everything else.

Just why? Why isn't the current system not good enough? Why should have 2 people lead? I think this would be pretty stupid since parties on this network aren't that big. Mostly you play with 2, 3 or 4 people. So it isn't to hard for the owner to keep track of what happens and when to kick someone. (Parties with 10 people or above change the story)

So I say no, unless this feature only gets activated when the party is bigger then 5 people.

i did not suggest for these ranks.