Party

[remio]

Hey, it's RemiO05 again!
I don't know or anyone else has made a thread about this topic, if so, don't blame it on me.
I think there is an annoying fact in this server.
The amount of players in a party.
For stone ranks, like me, you can only have 3 players in a party, 1 owner and 2 members.
I like to see 4 or more members +1 owner.
Do you agree or do you disagree?
Please tell me why.
Comment below!

 

[Troublesomee]

Hmm, not sure. I would agree considering having a maximum of two players is not convenient. What if you have three friends you want to play with? They could higher it a bit, I'd be fine with that.

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

Hey, it's RemiO05 again!
I don't know or anyone else has made a thread about this topic, if so, don't blame it on me.
I think there is an annoying fact in this server.
The amount of players in a party.
For stone ranks, like me, you can only have 3 players in a party, 1 owner and 2 members.
I like to see 4 or more members +1 owner.
Do you agree or do you disagree?
Please tell me why.
Comment below!

I mean it would be nice. Being a fellow donator, I think stone ranked people should be able to have bigger parties.

 

[remio]

I mean it would be nice. Being a fellow donator, I think stone ranked people should be able to have bigger parties.

Yes.
That's what I think

 

[Edgeless]

They try to encourage people to buy ranks

 

[Despacito 2]

Right after the party system got released I suggested to add 1 more member for every rank. I definitely agree that the amount for Stone Ranks should be increased. Currently they're only able to send two other people party invites which really isn't that convenient.

 

[Gainfullterror]

Party slots are limited to give ranks another perk. Stone ranks, as you know, are limited to a maximum of 3 members (owner included).
I don't think increasing the amount of slots for stone ranks is necessary, mainly because parties aren't a necessity to play with friends. Before the party system was released, teams of 5 for instance had to join the sign themselves without a party dragging them along. Since that's possible without parties, you can just make 2 or more parties of stone ranks to join the same game. Using multiple parties is a great way around the player limit, and I think encouraging that over increasing party slots seems like a good idea.
If players really want to though, I wouldn't be opposed to increasing the slots for stone ranks.

 

[BuriitoS]

Having these amount of players in the party will encourage people to buy ranks; however, I think they should increase party slots for stone ranked players.

 

[Eremo]

I think it's good how it is. If there are going to be more slots for stone, what's the point of buying a rank? For the XP and chatcolor?

 

[Injunction]

party slots for a stone rank is very easy to figure out
if you have more than 3 people than there are multiple ways to still all play together
Firstly
if anyone there does have a rank they can invite everyone and if they aren't going to be the party owner, just giving ownership to someone else
Secondly
You could just have a multiple separate full parties, of players and just have all the party owners join the same game on the signs
so you are all in the same game

 

[Eremo]

Or do it on the old fashioned way.

"Yes right in the corner 2/12! We can still join!"

 

[Despacito 2]

Or do it on the old fashioned way.

"Yes right in the corner 2/12! We can still join!"

Or the real old way:
"Team come to the pond and say 123!1!1!"