I said that it didn't ban 1 million people but your excuse was that sentinel banned 1 million accounts.
No, that is a mere fact. I'm just mentioning the fact it banned a million accounts. That is in no way, an "excuse", moreover, just stating the fact, how it's plainly seen.
Fun fact: When I say Sentinel banned 1mil accounts and not 1mil people, I'm saying that not all those accounts are different individuals, therefore, indirectly saying at least some of them are alts of hackers. Which, completely contradicts your
own argument of "you still can't accept the fact a lot of hackers have alts". I'm not making an excuse, I'm just stating the fact as it is.
You only think that some hackers have alts
Show proof of where I showed that I think that? Because I don't recall saying that, whatsoever. I already know a lot of the Sentinel bans are alts. Again, even my own friends ended up hacking on over 30+ alts. Quite a staggering statistic when you figure out that the majority of Sentinel bans are just the same people hacking on new accounts. I already know that's how it works. Why do you think I don't know that? Where did I show my inability to understand that?
I told you that you could look up free alt generators but no, You don't want to.
I already know of those, I already used it once, it doesn't spark my interest. I know they exist. That is why I didn't look it up.
You also seem to be a helper wannabe, considering your lengthy paragraph of you not understanding of what I am trying to say.
Ah yes, the good old excuse of "This person knows how to debate and get their idea across, therefore he's a helper wannabe. Oh, also because he is showing positivity towards the server!" mid-argument.
Let's say I was, why does that matter, and why did it spark your interest in the middle of an argument about the anti cheat?
Just accept that I am right and your wrong.
I am right, and you are right. That's the irony. All your arguments against mine are things I've already mentioned and agreed on. The only part where you're wrong is your baseless assumptions you've made against me.
Also me explaining to you what excuse you were making twice and you saying I didn't explain how proves your incompetent
It's not an excuse though. Do you want me to get you the definition of an excuse?
"Try to justify."
What am I trying to justify by saying Sentinel banned 1mil accounts instead of 1mil people? I can't understand you at all. Or do you mean something else, besides excuse? Because I still can't understand why that is considered an excuse, and at the very least, an excuse for what? What am I trying to excuse?