Points for top 3 winners

[wiebe de jong]

So i have an idea that would make playing egg and sky wars much nicerr.
so i played a eggwars game of 40 minutes and i was 1v1 and i got killed. So i didnt get anything,, i wasted 40 of my time and only got points for kills and no more. My amazing idea was that you can get less amounts of points if you finish 3rd or 2nd.
but you need to keep watching the game. if you are 2nd you get 25 points and if you are 3rd you get 10 points.

 

[ChillyTree]

This would be very difficult to keep track of, and I do not think it is necessary. 1st off there is two games like that, Mineware and Arcade. 2nd off it wouldn't make much of a difference to the game that it would need to be updated. Sorry but -1 for me.

 

[ElPtricko]

Maybe. If this was to get added it should be 3rd, 5 Points and 2nd, 10 points just so that you still get a lot more when winning 1st place.
But I'm not too sure about this as it's a pvp game, only one person wins so only one person gets something out of it.

 

[CubeTale]

I don't think this is a good idea. People can camp the whole game and still become second this way. This is an amazing stratagy for people who are not very good. The number of campers wil increase and I think nobody is waiting for this...

 

[Bob_the_Giraffe]

I don't think we should give points out to players for second and third in these games. Some players trying to "Point farm" will just camp to get more points. We have 2nd/3rd places available only in games such as Minerware and Arcade as those depend mostly on individual performances and not just camping :P

 

[GeldHaftige]

Fist> we will get more campers, because they want to end in top 3.

Second> We have already games, where you can get points, If you are second or third. I understand your problem, but the reason why disagree is because we will more campers on eggwars.

Third> I agree with this for skywars. It would be nice If there is a top 3.

 

[Play_list]

It wil just make peaple camp and wil make games even longer, there also are some games that start with only 4 players and wil make getting points way to easy.
However thanks for your idea.

-Play_list

 

[wiebe de jong]

OK, but i wasted an whole hour on just one game and didnt get anything out of it

 

[CaptaiinAmerica]

I disagree it would be pretty annoying towards other people who don't have as long games. I think we should just keep it simple and give the points to the winners of the game.

 

[Play_list]

OK, but i wasted an whole hour on just one game and didnt get anything out of it

Thats how skywars is my man

 

[Injunction]

I personally find this somewhat cheap I don't really like this in any game the only 2 I can understand is Minerware and Arcade since yes they have this and it works but for skywars I don't think this would work at all nor eggwars not survival games basically no other games since it ruins the point of working very hard for the points in those game and to win

 

[Troublesomee]

If you're second or first at skywars or eggwars, then you probably already obtained a lot of points. This is why I don't think it's necessary to have this.
You work hard for your place and standing there would already be a reward to me, so no, sorry.

 

[Dqnnny]

Great idea

 

[Gaaabb]

So i have an idea that would make playing egg and sky wars much nicerr.
so i played a eggwars game of 40 minutes and i was 1v1 and i got killed. So i didnt get anything,, i wasted 40 of my time and only got points for kills and no more. My amazing idea was that you can get less amounts of points if you finish 3rd or 2nd.
but you need to keep watching the game. if you are 2nd you get 25 points and if you are 3rd you get 10 points.

I don't like your suggestion, -1
Stay happy!
-Gaaabb