If so, I think the answer is 21
I may be an overthinker…
I plotted some points, starting at (0,2), then (1,10), then (2,12) and so on
It doesn’t look like a regular function, but there’s sort of a pattern. There are these clusters of points, first a cluster of 1, 2, then 3.
The distance from the clusters goes from 8 to 5, which has a difference of 3. So I assumed that the distance from the highest point to the next cluster is 2, but I could be wrong about that
So the next value would ideally be 21
Also, there’s the distance between the points inside of a cluster, which seems to decrease by 1, so the next distance would be… either 0 or 0.5
So all 4 points could be merged together at 21 or they’re apart by 0.5. If we assume it’s a function, which I’m thinking it probably should be, then definitely 0.5. But I guess that distance doesn’t really matter since we’re only finding the first point