Some possibilities if sentinel doesnt get updated

[catdisc]

It’s a bad anticheat. I really do not have to explain how it’s bad, there’s so many videos proving it’s bad
EDIT: the 3rd option is supposed to say: the staff gits gud

 

[LordSidi0us]

It’s a bad anticheat. I really do not have to explain how it’s bad, there’s so many videos proving it’s bad
EDIT: the 3rd option is supposed to say: the staff gits gud

1.5 million for like 2.5 years of its existence.It can’t catch absolutely everyone,because hacks are getting better everyday as well.Thats why moderation staff exsists.If you want to catch cheaters you can report them always

 

[Finixly]

Could you make a better one? Probably no.

Sentinel is getting updated everytime, but clients too.
And as xXIIIIIIXx it has banned over 2500000 people within 2.5 years; so it's not that bad.

 

[Deleted member 492126]

2500000 million

2500000 million = 2500000000000

 

[LordSidi0us]

c

2500000 million = 2500000000000

jesus he is human tho.-.

 

[Finixly]

2500000 million = 2500000000000

:confused1:, well maybe that was the thing I wanted to say!

 

[Ducky]

Next time, I'd look for more threads about this since you're not the only one who says this. Though, you can't just make the perfect anticheat, that takes a long time. What about you make an anticheat by yourself? I bet you're not gonna make it.

Sentinel is learning more bit by bit. Yes it takes time, but like @Finixly said, clients get updated so Sentinel has to learn more about that as well.

And about the 3rd option, what do you mean with that? Staff can't always be online, remember that.

 

[catdisc]

Next time, I'd look for more threads about this since you're not the only one who says this. Though, you can't just make the perfect anticheat, that takes a long time. What about you make an anticheat by yourself? I bet you're not gonna make it.

Sentinel is learning more bit by bit. Yes it takes time, but like @Finixly said, clients get updated so Sentinel has to learn more about that as well.

And about the 3rd option, what do you mean with that? Staff can't always be online, remember that.

hmmmmmmm, then how come ive been using the same hacks for almost a year? Sentinel doesnt learn anything from banning hackers, thats just a myth. I dont have to make an anticheat, because anticheats like AAC is already way better than sentinel. It detects almost any kind of movement hacks, with barley any false positives. What I mean by the 3rd optionn is that the staff will get very good

 

[catdisc]

1.5 million for like 2.5 years of its existence.It can’t catch absolutely everyone,because hacks are getting better everyday as well.Thats why moderation staff exsists.If you want to catch cheaters you can report them always

It cant catch almost any hacker, because sentinel doesnt get updated. 90% of those sentinel bans are in 1.8 and u know, they have alts and sentinel can false ban

 

[Ducky]

hmmmmmmm, then how come ive been using the same hacks for almost a year? Sentinel doesnt learn anything from banning hackers, thats just a myth. I dont have to make an anticheat, because anticheats like AAC is already way better than sentinel. It detects almost any kind of movement hacks, with barley any false positives. What I mean by the 3rd optionn is that the staff will get very good

I guess you're very lucky that you haven't been banned yet.

I'm not gonna assume anything about Sentinel as I am not a developer nor the developer of Sentinel. And sorry, but AAC anticheats? You know Sentinel is a house made anticheat?

Staff is trying to deal with them as much as possible, but I still don't get your statement. "They will get very good"? Yeah they do their best, but that's not what you're saying.

 

[catdisc]

You know Sentinel is a house made anticheat?

yes but its bad

Staff is trying to deal with them as much as possible, but I still don't get your statement. "They will get very good"? Yeah they do their best, but that's not what you're saying.

OHHHH, people cheat for hours and hours on the same alt, and I am saying that staff may get good if sentinel is not gona get updated

 

[Ducky]

yes but its bad

Again, try to make your own and we'll see how good that one is. Maybe just have some little respect for the person who's working on the anticheat.

OHHHH, people cheat for hours and hours on the same alt, and I am saying that staff may get good if sentinel is not gona get updated

I bet you didn't report them. If it's irritating you, maybe try to report them because then you solved that problem on your own. If Sentinel is not gonna get updated, the staff may get good? First, the Developer tries his best to make it better. Second, how is the staff only getting better when Sentinel isn't going to be updated?

 

[Deleted member 112709]

hmmmmmmm, then how come ive been using the same hacks for almost a year? Sentinel doesnt learn anything from banning hackers, thats just a myth. I dont have to make an anticheat, because anticheats like AAC is already way better than sentinel. It detects almost any kind of movement hacks, with barley any false positives. What I mean by the 3rd optionn is that the staff will get very good

Sentinel will never be at the same level as AAC's current movement check.

 

[catdisc]

Sentinel will never be at the same level as AAC's current movement check.

tbh ur right cubecraft doesnt care about sentinel

 

[Deleted member 112709]

tbh ur right cubecraft doesnt care about sentinel

Even if they care, it would never be at the same level.

 

[LeCastel]

Could you make a better one? Probably no.

Sentinel is getting updated everytime, but clients too.
And as xXIIIIIIXx it has banned over 2500000 people within 2.5 years; so it's not that bad.

Well, it's kind of a double-edged sword.

More than 2.5 million bans means it does indeed do it's job. However it also means that yes it is that bad, because 2.5 million hackers had to be banned by sentinel alone. Now imagine the amount of hackers banned by the staff and the amount of hackers that never got punished. It's pretty bad.

But that's Minecraft.

 

[Finixly]

Well, it's kind of a double-edged sword.

More than 2.5 million bans means it does indeed do it's job. However it also means that yes it is that bad, because 2.5 million hackers had to be banned by sentinel alone. Now imagine the amount of hackers banned by the staff and the amount of hackers that never got punished. It's pretty bad.

But that's Minecraft.

Well, I almost never meet hackers. And if I do, I mostly kill (trapping, critting) them cause they're pretty bad.

 

[catdisc]

Well, I almost never meet hackers. And if I do, I mostly kill (trapping, critting) them cause they're pretty bad.

what gamemode and what version u play on cube?

 

[Finixly]

what gamemode and what version u play on cube?

I play several gamemodes on 1.9. Mostly Skywars or Duels

 

[catdisc]

I play several gamemodes on 1.9. Mostly Skywars or Duels

XD? you sure there isnt hackers in skywars, theres lots of them but not alot in duels. 1.9 skywars has less hackers than 1.8, but it still has a bit of hackers