[Suggestion] Social Mechanics

[maxminoS]

I would like to suggest the removal of friend limits in exchange of creating parties. As most of you know, Stone members are limited to only about 10-11 friends, which is bizarre, while it increases the higher donor rank you are.

The reason that I think this is bizarre is because it limits "how much friends we can have." So I think it would be better for members to have unlimited friends, while donors receives the perk of creating parties.

What are parties?
Obviously, they aren't the kind of parties that has tons of people and listen to music while doing illegal stuff with. But it has the same idea. A party consists of a certain amount of members (can be limited depending on donor ranks), enabling all its members to join the game the host is in. Parties are temporary and a member will get kicked if he/she disconnects. The host can also kick the members if they want to. The whole idea about parties is that you can play with your friends and connect to the same servers easily.

How does different donor ranks affect the party system?
The different donor ranks will affect the system by merely giving limits to the amount of members a single party contain. Below is a suggestion, and generally has the same idea with "limited amount of members in a single party:"

Iron - Limited to parties of two
Lapiz - Limited to parties of four
Gold - Limited to parties of six
Diamond - Limited to parties of eight
Emerald - Limited to parties of ten
Obsidian - Limited to parties of twelve

What other things can be inside the party system?
There are also other things that can be included in the party system than just joining a game together. These things can be party chat, where you can chat only with the members of your party, challenging other parties in a 1v1 party minigame (such as Tower Defence), and more that you can suggest below.

Please vote on the poll and have a nice day :)

 

[Zombiepower]

I like the sytem about party's but the thing that i disagree is that members get unlimited friends that's a reason why we paid a rank for the friends...

 

[DrHam]

It's a really good idea, but

disagree is that members get unlimited friends

 

[maxminoS]

I don't get why it's harmful to have unlimited friends, maybe you can limit it to like 100 or something?

that's a reason why we paid a rank for the friends...

I honestly don't see the problem here because that's the reason why I suggested the parties system to replace it.

 

[Zombiepower]

I don't get why it's harmful to have unlimited friends, maybe you can limit it to like 100 or something?



I honestly don't see the problem here because that's the reason why I suggested the parties system to replace it.

Yeah just see what the admins gonna react

 

[Power Ranger]

I'm a stone and have over 20 friends :P but that is a bug. Parties are apparently coming soon though but I really hope they aren't given restrictions for stone ranks

 

[Megaaa]

creating parties.

They are working on that.

About unlimited friends: I think it is a bug. Hopefully it is in their fix list. :D

 

[maxminoS]

I understand that they may be creating parties and all, but I am proposing that friends should not be limited to Stone members and replacing that perk, they will be able to create a party of a few players which are invited.

 

[Megaaa]

friends should not be limited to Stone members

Why is the point of being a ranked then?

 

[maxminoS]

That is why I thought of the idea. Instead of having more members in your friend list, ranks will be able to create and invite more players in their party as it goes on, please completely read my first post for examples.

 

[Megaaa]

That is why I thought of the idea. Instead of having more members in your friend list, ranks will be able to create and invite more players in their party as it goes on, please completely read my first post for examples.

Still no. That would be useless if you reach your friends and then you also can have parties with more friends. [If I read it right]