what? There are alot of people with a high level that didnt buy multipliers lol
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
It's quite simple:
If we had a level leaderboard, you can - and players will have - bought there spot on it. That's why I would find a level-leaderboard pretty dumb. That doesn't mean no one can have a high level without ever buying a multiplier, but the option is there.
It's like if you could buy bundles of 100 wins in a game to boost your position on those leaderboards. I don't think many players would like that :)
True, surely there are more high level players that never bought a multiplier... but that's not really relevant actually.
Yes, you can get pretty high without spending a single cent. However, you can (and people have) bought themselves a lot of levels through the use of multipliers. That's a fact. It will make the leaderboard a money contest and not a play/grid leaderboard. Which in my opinion would not be a good thing, but to each their own.
Never playing na op again........
Note: the game was Sky Wars Mega, the map was Lucky, and loot was OP
Planned Top level leaderboard including yours
I know, but not everyone has the time to play that much. For example. I’ve been playing since 2014 and I’m almost level 70.
D
Deleted member 576174
Guest
I just don't understand how this affects the addition of a leaderboard.
No, now I read it back it doesn't make sense indeed.
It's quite simple:
If we had a level leaderboard, you can - and players will have - bought there spot on it. That's why I would find a level-leaderboard pretty dumb. That doesn't mean no one can have a high level without ever buying a multiplier, but the option is there.
It's like if you could buy bundles of 100 wins in a game to boost your position on those leaderboards. I don't think many players would like that :)
A place on the leaderboard. I think it's unreachable for people who rather not pay for extras.
They don't win anything though. It's not like they're getting rewards for being on the leaderboard
No, but it's not about that. The game leaderboards are based on actual skill and experience. This leaderboard will be filled with people who like to spend money on the game. I don't like the sound of that, to be honest.
That makes sense and I can agree to a certain degree but it's not P2W. Maybe it's possible for developers to see how much EXP came from multipliers and subtract that from the calculation so the leaderboard will exclude multiplier EXP?
its not unreachable? Neo_k4t4n4 is level 300+ without spending money?
The is probably no proof for that. And still, that's only 1 person.
True, surely there are more high level players that never bought a multiplier... but that's not really relevant actually.
Yes, you can get pretty high without spending a single cent. However, you can (and people have) bought themselves a lot of levels through the use of multipliers. That's a fact. It will make the leaderboard a money contest and not a play/grid leaderboard. Which in my opinion would not be a good thing, but to each their own.
D
Deleted member 486292
Guest
so heres what I dont understand about this suggestion. Why is it only for levels? Does cubecraft want to just encourage xp farming? I feel like total wins and winstreaks deserve spotlight as well. Better leaderboard recognition has been suggested MULTIPLE times in the past and now cubecraft gives a suggestion about level leaderboards the time of day. Thats kind of silly in my opinion.
There is, his stats add up to his lvl approximately. The left over xp is too little for a multipliers and can be given to other removed games/voting/daily rewards.
Similar threads
Team online
-
FlxenMeowderator
Latest profile posts
Never playing na op again........
Note: the game was Sky Wars Mega, the map was Lucky, and loot was OP
