Ah sorry :D, what I mean is, usually on games like arcade, when someone is drawn with points, someone is put into second and the other is put in first - but they have the same points. So I was suggesting that maybe there could be a joint first place where if two or more players have the same amount of points, then they're all in first place.uhhh? Can you be more specific? I don't
Really understand it sorry.
I now realise how much little detail my post has lol :P basically what I mean is that I think it's unfair how people can have the same amount of points in a game, but one person is still second, rather than joint first with the person that has the same amount of points as them.
Thank you:) and yeah me too.That's actually a nice idea. I definitely would like to see this when it's a draw.
um, does that really matter? .3.Past tense of join is joined pls correct
It's okay no problem, your English is fine:)owwww, now I understand. I agree with this because if the number 2 and the number 1 both got 15 trophies. the number one gets more xp at the end if the match ends. Sorry for bad englisch...
You know what, I didn't think about that, I suppose it would make sense if the prize was halved as it is a large prize.The problem is, the prize is a lot of points, and would the prize be halfed?
'joint' is a completely different term used compared to 'joined' or 'join'.Past tense of join is joined pls correct
Yes, its so annoying when 2 people have the same amount of trophies yet one of them are in first place and nthey win rather than it being a tie or somethin +1
Fair enough :)I do like this but I also dislike it as in paintball especially this would have A LOT of ties and would have almost everyone joining getting some reward
I just don't think this should be added