Well, 6 new maps have been released today! You should give it a look.
I really like them from what I've seen so far!
I really like them from what I've seen so far!
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
i believe this map is quite oody therefore it deserves the death penalty ,, still a 7/10
but it was a question just coz my answer doesn’t fit UR opinion....... fat
destroying your bridge and start building a fortress and bowspamming isn't bannable. It is considered camping when you build a base underneath your island or a skybase. So that is not a reason to vote no. There are lots of rush maps already, why not adding some old school maps back which people do like, even if the duration of the game is like 30 minutes.
I agree, the map Under da sea is not available that much. So I would love to see more of that kind of maps. I do miss some long games I've had in the past (under da sea was one of them).
I understood you wrong then, sorry. But there are lots of rush maps already (city, storm etc). Adding 1 or 2 bigger maps like under da sea won't really increase the amount of campers. There are still people who love long games, adding 1 more map like these won't harm anything or anyone.
Never playing na op again........
Note: the game was Sky Wars Mega, the map was Lucky, and loot was OP
Ya. Im ok with op half or norm norm. They are equally fun to me. Something that a lot of ppl dont like about under da sea is that its easy to camp. I understand why they think that, but I do think longer, more strategic gameplay is fun, with less rushing. If I want a more chill game, I usually go for this map.
under da sea is a very poo map because the clam is a bit ugly however the mermaid in the middle is gorgeous, 7/10 takes too long to finish and too many campers x
I like the is map for all thosr same reasons. I enjoy longer more campy games. I also enjoy rushing, and when i want to play aggressivly, i agree this map is annoying.
i believe this map is quite oody therefore it deserves the death penalty ,, still a 7/10
Uh that seems a little agressive. Under da sea is one of the best maps, just because it doesnt fit everyones playstyle doesnt mean its a bad map.
but it was a question just coz my answer doesn’t fit UR opinion....... fat
destroying your bridge and start building a fortress and bowspamming isn't bannable. It is considered camping when you build a base underneath your island or a skybase. So that is not a reason to vote no. There are lots of rush maps already, why not adding some old school maps back which people do like, even if the duration of the game is like 30 minutes.
I agree, the map Under da sea is not available that much. So I would love to see more of that kind of maps. I do miss some long games I've had in the past (under da sea was one of them).
Let me make something clear. I said that the map can make people encourage to camp more than in a map where the islands are closer and more compacter from each other. CCG works on the reduction of the campers; if you keep implementing maps where people get more encouraged to camp, the reduction won't go fast.
I understood you wrong then, sorry. But there are lots of rush maps already (city, storm etc). Adding 1 or 2 bigger maps like under da sea won't really increase the amount of campers. There are still people who love long games, adding 1 more map like these won't harm anything or anyone.
Yeah i totally agree. There are so many rush maps, and not many camp maps. They should add more.
Similar threads
Latest profile posts
Never playing na op again........
Note: the game was Sky Wars Mega, the map was Lucky, and loot was OP
