Solo Mode

[ariel098]

Please for the love of god make solo mode. I always queue up with teammates that 90% of them don't know how to place towers and spam them everywhere on the map. Solo mode will allow you to play however you wanna play without actually telling everyone to sell the towers so i can place more towers.

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Please for the love of god make solo mode. I always queue up with teammates that 90% of them don't know how to place towers and spam them everywhere on the map. Solo mode will allow you to play however you wanna play without actually telling everyone to sell the towers so i can place more towers.

Why is there no option to vote no?

 

[Priley]

Why is there no option to vote no?

Probably because he wants people to explain why they'd be against this suggestion

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Probably because he wants people to explain why they'd be against this suggestion

But then you still can't vote. You either vote yes or not at all. So it will always be yes. :V

 

[Deleted member 352903]

But then you still can't vote. You either vote yes or not at all. So it will always be yes. :V

I think the right vote option would be "pineapple"

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

I think the right vote option would be "pineapple"

Totally! Pineapple is the best!

 

[Story]

Probably because he wants people to explain why they'd be against this suggestion

But people can also vote yes without saying why, so its still an unfair vote either way.

 

[Priley]

But people can also vote yes without saying why, so its still an unfair vote either way.

I mean, if someone is against your suggestion, you likely want to know why, just to hear opinions from people who disagree and hear how they see it
Though in most cases, people just vote no and don't really elaborate, whereas here someone maybe feels like commenting as they can't express themselves through a poll

On topic though, neat idea. Completely agree, this would be a nice duel mode

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

I mean, if someone is against your suggestion, you likely want to know why, just to hear opinions from people who disagree and hear how they see it
Though in most cases, people just vote no and don't really elaborate, whereas here someone maybe feels like commenting as they can't express themselves through a poll

On topic though, neat idea. Completely agree, this would be a nice duel mode

So then it’s unfair because they can’t say no.
Do you not hear yourself? It’s not really fair what so ever.

 

[Priley]

So then it’s unfair because they can’t say no.
Do you not hear yourself? It’s not really fair what so ever.

dOnt gO oFF tOpiC

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

dOnt gO oFF tOpiC

-_-

Anyway. I support the idea but as I stated earlier I dislike the way the poll is set up.

 

[Fliqa]

This is one big yes for me, I'd love to see this! ^-^

 

[Blocky]

But people can also vote yes without saying why, so its still an unfair vote either way.

I mean, if someone is against your suggestion, you likely want to know why, just to hear opinions from people who disagree and hear how they see it
Though in most cases, people just vote no and don't really elaborate, whereas here someone maybe feels like commenting as they can't express themselves through a poll

On topic though, neat idea. Completely agree, this would be a nice duel mode

So then it’s unfair because they can’t say no.
Do you not hear yourself? It’s not really fair what so ever.

Pay2win isn't fair either, life isnt fair either, the European union isn't fair either. Aka Deal with it

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Pay2win isn't fair either, life isnt fair either, the European union isn't fair either. Aka Deal with it

Do you really have to keep it going?

Just stop going off topic, please.

 

[Thaus]

Pay2win isn't fair either, life isnt fair either, the European union isn't fair either. Aka Deal with it

Lmfao, yes, we should make a bias vote because that's exactly what a debate is. Thanks for presenting the fallacy of irrelevancy.
Your argument is literally irrelevant.
Personally, the idea is fine, but the main problem would be paying for the extra servers. If it's going to to be solos, it should be duel tower defense,
to hasten up the wait time.

 

[Blocky]

Lmfao, yes, we should make a bias vote because that's exactly what a debate is. Thanks for presenting the fallacy of irrelevancy.
Your argument is literally irrelevant.
Personally, the idea is fine, but the main problem would be paying for the extra servers. If it's going to to be solos, it should be duel tower defense,
to hasten up the wait time.

Voting nothing can count as a no :>

 

[matcha]

Voting nothing can count as a no :>

Using the same logic, it can count as a yes, too.

On topic~ personally I'm not all too for a solo mode, as it's a bit hard to manage everything yourself in a game like Tower Defense. It sure is possible, but if you fall behind one moment, it'd be incredibly hard to jump back. I'm sure there are people out there capable of such feat. but for me at least, TD should remain a team game. Sure, you will have the occasional team mates that have no idea what they're doing, but there's still the hope of winning considering the fact that 1 + 1 is often better than just 2.

 

[ariel098]

There I added a no option. Hope you like it.

 

[Jevmen]

No, i think the game qas maded for play with teamates.
And a solo mode has a lot of problems,
A duos can be cool