Warning command

[Yaanniicck]

or you could just say "gangsterboi21 don't swear." It's actually less symbols to type it out then to use the command. This command would effectively make you type even more.

what he say!

 

[GuildOfficer]

some peeps are muted .-.

and some people want to warn players with a warn command

 

[TheFastBowler]

I don't mind having a command, it makes it look more professional and slightly more intimidating to be honest, and may actually stop people from breaking the rules, rather than having people saying something like this:

Player 1: $#%@!
Me: 1/2 Swearing, Player 1
Player 1: YOU MINI-MOD $%#@!

This command may enforce the rules more and make people actually realise that they will be reported and it is actually NOT mini-modding! This command is not exactly necessary of course, but I would prefer having it than being called out for mini-modding.

 

[RoboticToast]

Free mutes, enjoy.

 

[Mr_Riolu_]

and some people want to warn players with a warn command

Yeah, but wouldn`t they still be muted? So that means they cannot do /warning as well.

 

[Despacito 2]

Yeah, but wouldn`t they still be muted? So that means they cannot do /warning as well.

Commands don't affect muted people.
This command needs to affect them.
So I'm not sure how fix this problem yet...

 

[Clacks]

I really liked your idea!

 

[RoboticToast]

I really liked your idea!

Its still going on, so let me do it.

I really like your idea.

 

[Troublesomee]

Good idea.

 

[CommunistCactus]

To all people complaining that it can be "abused" no, just no.
Chat can be abused in general, so that's not a point.
Also even if it were a great huge ginormous deal a simple cooldown of the command would fix it.
Your argument is invalid.

 

[Tomasito]

To all people complaining that it can be "abused" no, just no.
Chat can be abused in general, so that's not a point.
Also even if it were a great huge ginormous deal a simple cooldown of the command would fix it.
Your argument is invalid.

> Chat can be abused in general

I think that's the reason why "manual" chat warnings are often ignored; the rule breaker has no clue if he's being trolled or actually warned. The /warning command should differentiate itself from normal chat on two things: format and authority. For example, format being a red font and authority giving the /warning permissions only to a subset of the community.

If the command is misused, it might lose some important power. And if that happens, the gap between regular chat and the /warning command gets really narrow.

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

The only way i can see this abused is chat spam but thats kind of irrelevant as you could spam anything

Now if you say someone could get falsely banned/ muted, you still need the evidence, the command does nothing really

 

[Despacito 2]

> Chat can be abused in general

I think that's the reason why "manual" chat warnings are often ignored; the rule breaker has no clue if he's being trolled or actually warned. The /warning command should differentiate itself from normal chat on two things: format and authority. For example, format being a red font and authority giving the /warning permissions only to a subset of the community.

If the command is misused, it might lose some important power. And if that happens, the gap between regular chat and the /warning command gets really narrow.

That's why we need to think of a way to keep players scared of this command.

 

[Tomasito]

That's why we need to think of a way to keep players scared of this command.

Ha! Yeah, that's one way to put it ;-)

 

[Redstqne]

With some other limitations to prevent spamming and false accusations, I think this could possibly work! If someone gets a lot of reports for the same reason, it will raise gaff suspicion and maybe they will check out to see if the player really is hacking, swearing, teaming, etc.

 

[Despacito 2]

With some other limitations to prevent spamming and false accusations, I think this could possibly work! If someone gets a lot of reports for the same reason, it will raise gaff suspicion and maybe they will check out to see if the player really is hacking, swearing, teaming, etc.

It's not a report command.
It's a warning.

 

[Rakion]

or you could just say "gangsterboi21 don't swear." It's actually less symbols to type it out then to use the command. This command would effectively make you type even more.

Yes but maybe, beside you saying it in public chat, by warning it can give the illusion it's a lot more serious so the effectiveness is better.

 

[Injunction]

I don't mind having a command, it makes it look more professional and slightly more intimidating to be honest, and may actually stop people from breaking the rules, rather than having people saying something like this:

Player 1: $#%@!
Me: 1/2 Swearing, Player 1
Player 1: YOU MINI-MOD $%#@!

This command may enforce the rules more and make people actually realise that they will be reported and it is actually NOT mini-modding! This command is not exactly necessary of course, but I would prefer having it than being called out for mini-modding.

but then again nobody ever really accuses anybody of mini-modding nobody really cares about that rule just saying
even the staff have given up on it, case and point there is nothing for reporting that out of the offences in the new report section

 

[_RoyqL]

Think that this command will be very useful cause I usually see people saying offensive things to me and other players

 

[Injunction]

*Bump*

you can't bump up a thread that is being posted on and is in time because people are already posting