nah fam, shouldve called the policeIkr, i should actually make 31 player safety reports
nah fam, shouldve called the policeIkr, i should actually make 31 player safety reports
wow oh my god yes so unfiar, getting a warning to tell u that smth is not allowed is so unfair
Here I have to say that I got warned like a year ago for answering to a question in staff help on discord. That kind of punishments for really minor infractions can only get people mad, I have to defend him there.View attachment 215161
When you misused staff help you were given a warning in the chat before a physical warning via the bot soThe guy answered a question of someone (probably without knowing that is not allowed) in order to help with all his good faith and instead of telling him that he can not talk through that channel, the guy is punished for trying to help on a channel that he didn’t even know he couldn't answer there.
Not knowing the rules does not make you exempt to punishments of course, but there is a lot of difference from when a person does it repeatedly on purpose to one who has no idea or is new and the only thing that he was doing was helping. Its called solidarity, and specifically with this particular case its absurd to punish someone for that reason. As simple as explaining to that person that is not allowed to talk on the staff-help, if he does it again he would be punished. It's nothing to write home about. The server is not a dictatorship and the staff are there to help, not to put commands.
I don't say it's unfair, I say it's stupid. I didn't even know I couldn't do that. There is a huge difference between doing something intentionally and doing that same thing with the only intention of helping other people without being aware of that minor rule. Punishing people for that reason can only get players mad for it, because these kind of punishments just don't make sense, as they are insignificant infractions and it wasn't done intentionally.wow oh my god yes so unfiar, getting a warning to tell u that smth is not allowed is so unfair
I don't say it's unfair, I say it's stupid. I didn't even know I couldn't do that.
The definition of a warning is to give someone 'cautionary advice'. The warning is what tells you it's not allowed without inflicting an immediate punishment.There is a huge difference between doing something intentionally and doing that same thing with the only intention of helping other people without being aware of that minor rule.
So you are saying that answering to someone in staff-help and acting in a toxic way and insulting other people deserve the same kind of punishment? I would understand the warning if I was spreading misinformation intentionally or spamming there, etc. But if you try to help other people, then mods should only tell you that you are not allowed to answer other people's questions there.The definition of a warning is to give someone 'cautionary advice'. The warning is what tells you it's not allowed without inflicting an immediate punishment.
A warning is us telling you- "this is disallowed" before you do it again and we punish you. It's not a punishment on its own.However, I don't want to comply about it because it's just a simple warning and I honestly don't care about it. I just say it's not the best way to treat your players if they did nothing wrong.
No, it puts you in the punishment track for breaking a rule with no importance. I'm fine with that anyways.A warning is us telling you- "this is disallowed" before you do it again and we punish you. It's not a punishment on its own.
It's only in the track so that we can refer to it later- it's a guarantee that "this person cannot plead ignorance because they have been told about the rule- they have received this warning. They know this is punishable in future."No, it puts you in the punishment track for breaking a rule with no importance. I'm fine with that anyways.
Well, that's the one of the basis of laws: "Not knowing about a rule does not exempt you from following it".It's only in the track so that we can refer to it later- it's a guarantee that "this person cannot plead ignorance because they have been told about the rule- they have received this warning. They know this is punishable in future."
You would get another warning.Well, that's the one of the basis of laws: "Not knowing about a rule does not exempt you from following it".
By the way, I'll ask a doubt about punishments that I have always had. Imagine I get punished for trolling (just to clarify this hasn't happened to me) in the server, the punishment tracks says the first punishment is a warning. If I get punished for camping later do I get straightly banned for 1 day or do I get another warning because I would have broken 2 different rules?
View attachment 215173
Oh I thought the punishment track applied to all the rules meaning that if you got a previous warning, you would get straightly banned for breaking another different rule.You would get another warning.
The annoying thing is I reported some one 3 days ago for scaffolding and he got banned. I deleted the evidence yesterday because I don’t want random videos in my YouTube channel then I got a warning saying I can’t delete evidence that are under 30 days and the hacker got unbanned, lucky him.Oh I thought the punishment track applied to all the rules meaning that if you got a previous warning, you would get straightly banned for breaking another rule.
Yeah, he got unbanned because if you delete the video, then CubeCraft can't prove they were scaffolding, so they get unbanned. Just set these videos as unlisted or create a secondary account just to upload your reports evidences there.The annoying thing is I reported some one 3 days ago for scaffolding and he got banned. I deleted the evidence yesterday because I don’t want random videos in my YouTube channel then I got a warning saying I can’t delete evidence that are under 30 days and the hacker got unbanned, lucky him.
Wasted 30 minuets “to make cubecraft a better place”, totally not worth it.The annoying thing is I reported some one 3 days ago for scaffolding and he got banned. I deleted the evidence yesterday because I don’t want random videos in my YouTube channel then I got a warning saying I can’t delete evidence that are under 30 days and the hacker got unbanned, lucky him.
So here is the funny part, rule 1.10 says if a report is denied you are not allowed to make a new one so I’m basically trapped right now.Yeah, he got unbanned because if you delete the video, then CubeCraft can't prove they were scaffolding, so they get unbanned. Just set these videos as unlisted or create a secondary account just to upload your reports evidences there.
Did cubecraft even think about this???So here is the funny part, rule 1.10 says if a report is denied you are not allowed to make a new one so I’m basically trapped right now.
It says if your report got denied, I don't think that applies to your case. The player was just unbanned because you deleted the evidence that proves they were cheating. However, contact a moderator to be 100% sure about this as I have no idea.So here is the funny part, rule 1.10 says if a report is denied you are not allowed to make a new one so I’m basically trapped right now.
Some times it takes a lot of time and effort to report some one till the point that you don’t even care anymore because you will never see him again and he probably got banned by another person.It says if your report got denied, I don't think that applies to your case. The player was just unbanned because you deleted the evidence that proves they were cheating. However, contact a moderator to be 100% sure about this as I have no idea.
I don't think so. If your report gets accepted that means the cheater wasn't banned before and that they were banned because you reported them. If no one did that, then we would depend of Sentinel, which bans a lot of hackers, but it still needs to be improved.Some times it takes a lot of time and effort to report some one till the point that you don’t even care anymore because you will never see him again and he probably got banned by another person.
I didnt mean this report that I just mentioned before, what I meant is reporting people in general. In my opinion it’s more stressful than not doing your homework.I don't think so. If your report gets accepted that means the cheater wasn't banned before and that they were banned because you reported them. If no one did that, then we would depend of Sentinel, which bans a lot of hackers, but it still needs to be improved.