Okay, i think they should atleast make a new kitpvp server that donators cant play on, and the "normal stone" player can get access to all the levels on only that server. And i wont consider anything. Its my opinion not yours! :)
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
i disagree you dont need to donate to win. It is very easy to get full iron and a iron sword to go with that and then just challenge a simple non enchanted diamond guy get the first hit on him you will win. It isnt DONATE TO WIN its SKILL FOR THE WIN
why I believe there is an in-justice in kit pvp
- Thread starter john
- Start date
The white listed stone server is a good idea, but they should still have the shop, and only lvl 1 or 2 kits.
awesomepingu2005
Well-Known Member
i disagree you dont need to donate to win. It is very easy to get full iron and a iron sword to go with that and then just challenge a simple non enchanted diamond guy get the first hit on him you will win. It isnt DONATE TO WIN its SKILL FOR THE WIN
Not necessarily...To be quite frank with you folks, diamond Armour is a little op against normal leather armored guys. I think they have a right to have a certain amount of 'Normal diamond Armour' period . This will encourage them to donate as they will enjoy the thrill of getting high kill streaks and absolutely tearing through the battlefield! :p
The reason to be in the armor is you want to have better armor, which makes you desire to donate, and once you do, you can destroy anyone you want. Except for hackers, and some higher donators :P which you should report the hackers btw, not waste your time trying to kill one.
As the writer of the original post this is not what I wanted to see. This argument can go on till you run the cap on your bandwidth. Guys, all I wanted in my original forum post was to alert people that I believe a donator should be able to give diamond/donator gear to stones. Without getting banned or called d**ks by players. If you disagree with me that is fine, I do not need everyone to agree with me for my points in my original post to be valid. Maybe a rule could be established that stated: If a donator wants to give something to a stone he needs to let the "stone" kill him and keep the gear that falls. This rule is will coexist with both disagreeing parties and it also supports my points in my original post. Again, if you do not agree then you can scream in your room at me for my annoying posts.
I think you have some good arguments but you're missing a great deal of things.
In your first point you talk about stones not being able to try diamond gear in kitpvp, but that is Why we added the points and shops so you can still get diamond armor even though you aren't a donator.
In your other point you talk about, the fact that if you spend 17 dollars on a server you are allowed to do what you want with what you bought. Now first, get the thought of it being a purchase out of your head. Its called a donation for a reason. You give a donation because you want to help something out. We have just made it more appealing to donate by giving rewards but that doesnt give you the right to do whatever you want with it. Its a rule, there for you shouldnt break that rule. It would be the same thing as buying minecraft, hack on a server, get banned and then go on to say, i am allowed to hack or else my 15 € wouldnt be Well spent.
You might think that its unfair but when you are playing on our server you have agree with the rules. Saying that you didnt get your moneys worth, money that you donated to an indie project, and is there for allowed to break the rules is a bs argument i my opinion
In your first point you talk about stones not being able to try diamond gear in kitpvp, but that is Why we added the points and shops so you can still get diamond armor even though you aren't a donator.
In your other point you talk about, the fact that if you spend 17 dollars on a server you are allowed to do what you want with what you bought. Now first, get the thought of it being a purchase out of your head. Its called a donation for a reason. You give a donation because you want to help something out. We have just made it more appealing to donate by giving rewards but that doesnt give you the right to do whatever you want with it. Its a rule, there for you shouldnt break that rule. It would be the same thing as buying minecraft, hack on a server, get banned and then go on to say, i am allowed to hack or else my 15 € wouldnt be Well spent.
You might think that its unfair but when you are playing on our server you have agree with the rules. Saying that you didnt get your moneys worth, money that you donated to an indie project, and is there for allowed to break the rules is a bs argument i my opinion
Yeah, you are right. I lost track and forgot that this was a donation and not a product. I also did not even know that there was a shop when I made my post. I hope that initial post did not flush my rep down the toilet. I just wanted to try to sway you to a idea of mine that is not a worthwhile endeavor after all.
I think people should be allowed to have a kit pvp with just stones irons and lapis people. And the other higher ranks get there own also. Since there are 4 kit pvp servers have 2 were anyone can to in one and have 1 wiht stones lapis and irons and one with the rest higher lvls so people are facing in general people of the same kind
Woah woah WOAH did you pay $16.22 for stone?! I only payed 10 English pounds xD FTW I guess it's ok to give stones spare diamond armour though, because when is as stone, I became a friend with a lapiz and I got diamond armour when I saw him, but I still donated I'm only making a point because sometimes it's because people aren't alloud to donate or if people just can't afford it, I think it should be alloud for us to give spare armour, but if anyone notices not be alloud to give armour then kill yourself :P only a piont :)
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
BlockWars Poll- Does Iron Gear make you a Priority in Bridges?- Latest: jamesthesignificant
-
-
